From: Stevan Bajić
>To: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
>Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 2:44 AM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>It does not indicate any wrong doing from your part. But considering your
>statement that spam is not well captured and looking at the amount
On 20.04.2012 19:41, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>
>> On 20.04.2012 07:32, Steve Fatula wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> If you give me the SPAM corpus, I can just run dspam_train on it (and I'd
>>> even add my 80). But it will be pretty unbalanced since I have
On Apr 20, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> On 20.04.2012 07:32, Steve Fatula wrote:
>> [...]
>
>> If you give me the SPAM corpus, I can just run dspam_train on it (and I'd
>> even add my 80). But it will be pretty unbalanced since I have few HAM
>> messages since I only keep a month (m
On 20.04.2012 07:32, Steve Fatula wrote:
[...]
If you give me the SPAM corpus, I can just run dspam_train on it (and
I'd even add my 80). But it will be pretty unbalanced since I have few
HAM messages since I only keep a month (maybe a few thousand
messages). I am not sure that matters much?
On 20.04.2012 07:32, Steve Fatula wrote:
*From:* Stevan Bajić
*To:* "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
*Sent:* Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:49 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
Spam: 1.391985007296783157922995792876 %
Ham: 98.608014992703216842077
