Re: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of spam/non-spam

2012-04-30 Thread Chad M Stewart
On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:18 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote: > On 30.04.2012 21:29, Chad M Stewart wrote: >> [...] >> In my model I have zero access to end user's mailboxes. Thus why I was >> thinking that training via web interface or via email would work. You're >> right a single button is easier. To

Re: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of spam/non-spam

2012-04-30 Thread Chad M Stewart
On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:10 PM, Steve Fatula wrote: > I've found requiring them to forward as attachment not so simple for users > though, esp. exchange users for some reason (I don't use exchange and never > have, so, not sure why). In the end, they give up and don't bother. While I despise Out

Re: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of spam/non-spam

2012-04-30 Thread Stevan Bajić
On 30.04.2012 21:29, Chad M Stewart wrote: > [...] > In my model I have zero access to end user's mailboxes. Thus why I was > thinking that training via web interface or via email would work. You're > right a single button is easier. To get that in my scenario means I'll have > to hire someon

Re: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of spam/non-spam

2012-04-30 Thread Steve Fatula
- Original Message - > From: Marko Weber > To: Dspam User > Cc: > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 4:05 AM > Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of > spam/non-spam > > > Mr Fatula, yes you are right with dovecot-antispam, just move mail and > all is okay. > B

Re: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of spam/non-spam

2012-04-30 Thread Chad M Stewart
On Apr 30, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote: > On 30.04.2012 17:49, Chad M Stewart wrote: >> On Apr 30, 2012, at 3:12 AM, Stevan Bajić wrote: >> >>> On 30.04.2012 04:46, Chad M Stewart wrote: I'd like to come up with a way where my users can forward mis-classified messages to a s

Re: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of spam/non-spam

2012-04-30 Thread Stevan Bajić
On 30.04.2012 17:49, Chad M Stewart wrote: > On Apr 30, 2012, at 3:12 AM, Stevan Bajić wrote: > >> On 30.04.2012 04:46, Chad M Stewart wrote: >>> I'd like to come up with a way where my users can forward mis-classified >>> messages to a single address, like fixme@ or correct@. I'm thinking that

Re: [Dspam-user] dspam eating attachments?

2012-04-30 Thread Stevan Bajić
On 30.04.2012 11:02, Jasper Wallace wrote: > Hi, > > I was recently sent an email with attachments but when it got to me the > attachments where missing. > > Looking at my exim logs I see (trimmed a bit): > > <= S=159015 > id=CAPm8LjoY=78e093hq_j0qhrwkx8ddssh34+zeg9ytzexfjs...@mail.gmail.com > =>

Re: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of spam/non-spam

2012-04-30 Thread Marko Weber
Am 30.04.2012 07:30, schrieb Steve Fatula: > - Original Message - > >> From: Chad M Stewart >> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net >> Cc: >> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 9:46 PM >> Subject: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of >> spam/non-spam >> >> >> I'd like to come

[Dspam-user] dspam eating attachments?

2012-04-30 Thread Jasper Wallace
Hi, I was recently sent an email with attachments but when it got to me the attachments where missing. Looking at my exim logs I see (trimmed a bit): <= S=159015 id=CAPm8LjoY=78e093hq_j0qhrwkx8ddssh34+zeg9ytzexfjs...@mail.gmail.com => R=dspam_router T=dspam_spamcheck S=159090 So thats a 155K

Re: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of spam/non-spam

2012-04-30 Thread Stevan Bajić
On 30.04.2012 04:46, Chad M Stewart wrote: > I'd like to come up with a way where my users can forward mis-classified > messages to a single address, like fixme@ or correct@. I'm thinking that the > address would be directed at a script. The script would then do the magic > and then call dspam