Re: [Dspam-user] SIEVE like filtering logic, does this sound reasonable?

2012-05-16 Thread Chad M Stewart
On May 16, 2012, at 5:10 PM, Steve Fatula wrote: > - Original Message - > >> From: Chad M Stewart >> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net >> Cc: >> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 2:38 PM >> Subject: [Dspam-user] SIEVE like filtering logic, does this sound reasonable? >> >> >> I want t

Re: [Dspam-user] SIEVE like filtering logic, does this sound reasonable?

2012-05-16 Thread Steve Fatula
- Original Message - > From: Chad M Stewart > To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 2:38 PM > Subject: [Dspam-user] SIEVE like filtering logic, does this sound reasonable? > > > I want to implement a sieve type filter, after dspam has processed the

Re: [Dspam-user] SIEVE like filtering logic, does this sound reasonable?

2012-05-16 Thread Benny Pedersen
Den 2012-05-16 21:38, Chad M Stewart skrev: > I want to implement a sieve type filter, after dspam has processed > the messages. In other words, if dspam marks the message as spam and > has a high degree of confidence, then silently discard the message. > Unfortunately Postfix does not have a nati

Re: [Dspam-user] SIEVE like filtering logic, does this sound reasonable?

2012-05-16 Thread k...@rice.edu
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 02:38:20PM -0500, Chad M Stewart wrote: > > I want to implement a sieve type filter, after dspam has processed the > messages. In other words, if dspam marks the message as spam and has a high > degree of confidence, then silently discard the message. Unfortunately > P

[Dspam-user] SIEVE like filtering logic, does this sound reasonable?

2012-05-16 Thread Chad M Stewart
I want to implement a sieve type filter, after dspam has processed the messages. In other words, if dspam marks the message as spam and has a high degree of confidence, then silently discard the message. Unfortunately Postfix does not have a native SIEVE implementation. I'm playing with Prox