On 07/10/2014 04:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 11.07.2014 00:54, schrieb Eric Shubert:
>> I don't think you understand what I meant. It would run as a stand-alone
>> (preferably virtual) host. It'd be transparent to anything you already
>> have. I thought that was your objective. If not, ple
Am 11.07.2014 00:54, schrieb Eric Shubert:
> I don't think you understand what I meant. It would run as a stand-alone
> (preferably virtual) host. It'd be transparent to anything you already
> have. I thought that was your objective. If not, please feel free to ignore.
> Thanks
no - you got me
I don't think you understand what I meant. It would run as a stand-alone
(preferably virtual) host. It'd be transparent to anything you already
have. I thought that was your objective. If not, please feel free to ignore.
Thanks.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
On 07/10/2014 02:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
Am 10.07.2014 19:50, schrieb Eric Shubert:
> On 07/10/2014 05:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> the goal is to have a MX for a lot of domains which
>> does postcreen/pre-queue content-filtering and deliver
>> good messages via transports to the final server
>
> Might I suggest using spamdyke (http:/
On 07/10/2014 05:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> the goal is to have a MX for a lot of domains which
> does postcreen/pre-queue content-filtering and deliver
> good messages via transports to the final server
Might I suggest using spamdyke (http://spamdyke.org) for this? Spamdyke
does no content fi
Am 10.07.2014 14:26, schrieb k...@rice.edu:
> The web interface is klunky, but the code problems relate more to
> DoS problems with very large quarantine sizes since it reads the
> entire mailbox into memory. It used to be a real problem back when
> machines had a few megabytes of memory, not so
Hi,
The web interface is klunky, but the code problems relate more to
DoS problems with very large quarantine sizes since it reads the
entire mailbox into memory. It used to be a real problem back when
machines had a few megabytes of memory, not so much when it is in
the gigabytes. :) This is so l
Am 10.07.2014 13:33, schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
> Hi Harald,
>
> The only thing that is in the screenshots is the web gui, which is
> ancient in the way it looks, the usability, and in the way it
> communicates to the backend
well, it looks like older Barracuda Firewall UI's
that's what the users kn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Harald,
The only thing that is in the screenshots is the web gui, which is
ancient in the way it looks, the usability, and in the way it
communicates to the backend. It could also have security issues but I
never looked into them.
I always used
