From: Paul Cockings
>To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 2:57 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>Hi Steve,
>
>How is your DSPAM installation? Are you achieving a higher
accuracy now? Did changing to TOE make a big difference?
>
>Well
- Original Message -
> From: Robert
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:11 PM
> Subject: [Dspam-user] sendmail, dspam, dovecot LDA how?
>
> I now want to use sieve filters, with our dovecot server this requires
> me to use dovecot as an LDA, i
- Original Message -
> From: Chad M Stewart
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 2:38 PM
> Subject: [Dspam-user] SIEVE like filtering logic, does this sound reasonable?
>
>
> I want to implement a sieve type filter, after dspam has processed the
- Original Message -
> From: Chad M Stewart
> To: Stevan Bajić
> Cc: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 9:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of
> spam/non-spam
>
>
> I've been around email for years and I don't like the
- Original Message -
> From: Stevan Bajić
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 2:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of
> spam/non-spam
>
> On 01.05.2012 1
>> Figure Outlook users can simply forward the message to the address and
> then the signature should be present in the body. Being a user preference
> they
> can easily change it if they desire. (Assuming I've given them an interface
> to do so.)
> This is where I have a problem. Forwa
- Original Message -
> From: Marko Weber
> To: Dspam User
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 4:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of
> spam/non-spam
>
>
> Mr Fatula, yes you are right with dovecot-antispam, just move mail and
> all is okay.
> B
- Original Message -
> From: Chad M Stewart
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc:
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 9:46 PM
> Subject: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of spam/non-spam
>
>
> I'd like to come up with a way where my users can forward mis-classified
So, trying to make the latest Macports portfile for the latest dspam. Got it
working, except, when I upgrade the port, it overlays dspam.conf. Is there a
way to prevent an upgrade of dspam from killing the users dspam.conf?
I don't see any doc in README, except, refer to UPGRADING. In that file,
From: Chad M Stewart
>To: Stevan Bajić
>Cc: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
>Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:01 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>
>> 3) Now go on and train with dspam_train: dspam_train SpamHitRate
>> [spam_corpus maildir or mbox] [nonspam_corpu
From: Stevan Bajić
>To: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
>Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 5:10 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>Which was to be expected. TEFT is an evil relict from the past.
>>>
>>>
But it's the default! That makes no logical sense to me that the devs w
From: Stevan Bajić
>To: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
>Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 2:28 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>That is correct, as I had mentioned, I did not have a lot of HAM to train with.
At least you have around 33K Ham messages. This is not that bad
I should also note that during dspam_train runs, it was sprinkled with "BROKEN
RESULT" messages instead of pass or fail. Not many of them, but, some.
Looking at the newgroup history, I really did not find a good explantion for
these. Does anyone know what they mean, with MySQL backend?
I am us
From: Stevan Bajić
>To: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
>Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 2:57 AM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>From all the 633K messages you processed you only had 70 falsely
classified as Spam while you had 5629 falsely classified as Ham.
This
From: Stevan Bajić
>To: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
>Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 11:39 AM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>
>3) Now go on and train with dspam_train: dspam_train SpamHitRate
[spam_corpus maildir or mbox] [nonspam_corpus maildir or mbox]
>
>After
From: Tom Fernandes
>To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 4:50 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] retraining not working (bailing on error 22)
>
>
>>
>>
>> What happens when you:
>>
>> select count(*) from dspam.dspam_signature_data where signature =
>> "4f8f82b415
From: Tom Fernandes
>To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 1:59 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] retraining not working (bailing on error 22)
>
>
>> >
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >I want to retrain false negatives using
>> >
>> >dspam --source=error --class=spam --user tom \
>>
From: Tom Fernandes
>To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 11:07 AM
>Subject: [Dspam-user] retraining not working (bailing on error 22)
>
>Hi,
>
>I want to retrain false negatives using
>
>dspam --source=error --class=spam --user tom \
>--signature=4f8f82b415657
From: Stevan Bajić
>To: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
>Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 2:44 AM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>It does not indicate any wrong doing from your part. But considering your
>statement that spam is not well captured and looking at the amount
From: Stevan Bajić
>To: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
>Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:49 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>Spam: 1.391985007296783157922995792876 %
>Ham: 98.608014992703216842077004207124 %
>
>This is crazy. You have about 70 times more Ham tokens
From: Stevan Bajić
>To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 6:37 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>If I get the exact same message, it sometimes still shows up on not spam, but,
>mostly, it shows up as spam the next time. So, my answer is it
From: Stevan Bajić
>To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 3:41 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>This is not good. But the above data is not that horrible. Anyway... allow me
>to ask you a bunch of questions:
>1) When you get a FN or a FP
From: Bradley Giesbrecht
>To: Steve Fatula
>Cc: Dspam List
>Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 3:04 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>I can't help you other then to point out that you may have missed the two
>replies prior to the one yo
>On my setup DSPAM is disabled for most users as they don't need it, the checks
>that are in place at the MTA are sufficient enough for those users to receive
>a very low level of spam. DSPAM is used for some troublesome accounts or
>those that want/can handle training a filter.
>
>That's gre
From: Nathanael Noblet
>To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 8:12 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Dspam ending in daemon mode
>
>Not sure if you are aware but dspam is in the epel repos for
>CentOS/RHEL. Are you using that build? If you aren't is there a reason
An addendum to what I just wrote... I changed to the user instead of using sudo
to run spam with no fork, and, it ends with one additional line - segmentation
fault.
So, the end of the debug is:
30657: [01/22/2012 15:59:50] find attribute 'Home'
30657: [01/22/2012 15:59:50] -> found attribute
I am setting up spam on a new server, centos 6, should be the same as other
servers I have set spam up on, though, they were not Centos 6.
I sent a test message via the command line mail command. I am running spam in
verbose debug mode, and, no fork. I used: sudo -s dspam --debug --daemon
--no
- Original Message -
> From: Tom Hendrikx
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 4:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Signature location enhancement request
>
> This way of solving your issue is very opaque to users. They want
> something to hap
Here's the issue. It would be nice if the user preference signatureLocation had
one more option. The current choices are:
headers - which puts it in the header only, great for imap users
message - which puts it in header AND the body
I would like for it to go ONLY into the body. The logic is thi
> From: Julien Vehent
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2011 7:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] How to know if retraining is working
>
> Quoting myself
> http://wiki.linuxwall.info/doku.php/en:ressources:dossiers:dspam
> Read "8 Test Procedure"
>
I used DSPAM many years ago, and, have gone back to it again. I am using
dovecot-antispam (well, version 2 for dovecot 2) to do the re-training. Thus
far, I have learned 59 spam, most of which are very similar in nature. My
recollection was that DSPAM learned very quickly, but this is not happen
It already does post timestamps. Based on your log record, it was at Fri Jul 22
01:39:22 CDT 2011
I got this via the first field in your log file, and the command:
date -d @1311316762
Steve
--
10 Tips for Better Web
Was hoping this did what it sort of implies (to me at least), which was to put
the signature in the message body, which to me then meant NOT in the header.
But, it's still in the header, so, it's actually in both.
I have two types of users, those that use Imap and or webmail and can use
dovecot
>Better tell us what the "simple" and the "advanced" content filter
> methods are.".
Sure, was using standard postfix terms.
http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html
This documents each method, and, tells you the why of it. Advantages documented
on that page include:
1. Faster performance
2.
Looking for a master.cf file showing how you set this up as an advanced content
filter. Not the simple one, nor the one found in the dspam readme files for
postfix. I have been unable to find any anywhere on the interner, all the
examples use the simple content filter method.
Steve
35 matches
Mail list logo
