Re: [Dspam-user] "invalid byte sequence" with dspam-3.10.1 and postgresql-9.1.1

2011-12-07 Thread Sven
27;s IMHO still a more serious problem since mails can get permanently and silently lost which tends to make people really angry. Cheers, -sven -- Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization This white pape

Re: [Dspam-user] "invalid byte sequence" with dspam-3.10.1 and postgresql-9.1.1

2011-12-07 Thread Sven
ng for a soon release of 3.10.2. I'm too busy in December to do the VCS workaround on all my boxes. Cheers, -sven -- Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization This white paper is intended to serve

Re: [Dspam-user] "invalid byte sequence" with dspam-3.10.1 and postgresql-9.1.1

2011-11-29 Thread Sven
works as is or needs some tweaks as well. Given a number of people might bump into this problem, I hope it won't take too long for 3.10.2 to be released. Cheers, -sven -- All the data continuously generated in you

[Dspam-user] "invalid byte sequence" with dspam-3.10.1 and postgresql-9.1.1

2011-11-29 Thread Sven
291545272412566',752,CURRENT_DATE,E'\xae7c566c2052851801 00bf80774b2dadefd301 ... ') Do the dspam tables require an encoding other than UTF8? Cheers, -sven -- All the data continuously generated in

Re: [Dspam-user] dspam-3.8.0 and sqlite-3.6.19 issue

2009-12-27 Thread Sven Schwyn
Hi Stevan > how could I not be? I am the original author of the DSPAM Ebuild. :) That should help :-D > I am strongly believing that the SQLite driver in 3.8.0 is the root of the > problem. I have fixed a bunch of issues with the SQLite driver in 3.9.0 but > not as much as I have done for MySQ

Re: [Dspam-user] dspam-3.8.0 and sqlite-3.6.19 issue

2009-12-27 Thread Sven Schwyn
on --disable-homedir Does anybody run dspam with sqlite3 driver? Cheers, -sven PS: A pile of patches are applied before dspam is compiled. Some may be "made by Gentoo" though: * Applying various patches (bugfixes/updates) ... * 01_all_manpage-in-right-section.patch ...

Re: [Dspam-user] dspam-3.8.0 and sqlite-3.6.19 issue

2009-12-27 Thread Sven Schwyn
s -user-homedirs -virtual-users - sqlite: readline threadsafe -debug -doc -fts3 -icu -soundex -tcl One oddity: The storage files created in /var/spool/dspam/data seem to have wrong owner/permissions (root:root) initially. However, changing it to root:dspam with group write doesn'

[Dspam-user] dspam-3.8.0 and sqlite-3.6.19 issue

2009-12-27 Thread Sven Schwyn
And dspam_incoming looks like this: http://pastie.org/private/ix0cvqu64znc0nzn1tvfva Any ideas what I'm missing here? Thanks a bunch... -sven -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community T

Re: [Dspam-user] high level of missed ham, but all factors at 0.01000

2009-08-26 Thread Sven Karlsson
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Steve wrote: > If I would be in your situation then I would download DSPAM 3.9.0 BETA and > install it on a test system and just train it with those 5000 mails you have > there and then take my mailbox and push all mails over 3.9.0 and look how > well it scores.

Re: [Dspam-user] high level of missed ham, but all factors at 0.01000

2009-08-26 Thread Sven Karlsson
ing cat $mail | /usr/bin/dspam --source=error --class=hamfor the user-retrained mails. Or are there other suggestions how such a scenario would/could be set up? BR Sven -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporti

Re: [Dspam-user] Dspam - any point on training 'sent' mail?

2009-08-26 Thread Sven Karlsson
r comments on this. One issue could be skewing the ham/spam ratio, as no spam is going out. Also headers are different, which could give some misweight perhaps? BR Sven -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crys

Re: [Dspam-user] high level of missed ham, but all factors at 0.01000

2009-08-26 Thread Sven Karlsson
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Steve wrote: > > Original-Nachricht >> Datum: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:33:19 +0200 >> Von: Sven Karlsson >> An: Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net >> Betreff: [Dspam-user] high level of missed ham, but all factors at 0.010

[Dspam-user] high level of missed ham, but all factors at 0.01000

2009-08-25 Thread Sven Karlsson
Hello, I'm getting a lot (in the range of 5-10 percent, perhaps more) of false positives in our dspam setup, so I enabled showFactors to figure out whats going on. In the example below, all factors are 0.01, but it is still classified as spam, albeit with a confidence of 0.6. X-DSPAM-Confidence