On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:19:37AM +0100, RW wrote:
>
> I've noticed that DSPAM can slightly modify the mime layout when mail
> is piped through it with --stdout. It's a problem if the output is
> piped through another filter, such as SpamAssassin, because it
> changes the DKIM body hash.
>
> In
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:34:25AM -0500, Al Zick wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone help me please?
>
> Dspam will run for a long time now. However, it fills the /var
> directory and I end up do a new corpus training. Also, I can not
> retrain dspam. When I run dspamc to retrain it gives me an e
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 07:30:48AM -0400, Al Zick wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if anyone can help. It seems spam is unstoppable and
> keeps getting worst.
>
> At this point, I would just like to remove dspam from my config, but
> there is a large number of emails in my postfix cache that are
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 09:07:49AM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 10/14/15 09:03, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> > Hi Phil,
> >
> > That would explain why we have not seen an issue because we use LMTP
> > for delivery from DSPAM, and not SMTP. You might want to give it a tr
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 07:09:46AM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 10/14/15 03:03, Marco wrote:
> >> Indeed, I am running 3.0, and have been for some months now. (I
> >> actually just updated from 3.0.2-r2 to 3.0.3 this morning.)
> >
> > Just for info... I run Postfix 3.0.2 (compatibility_leve
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:01:21AM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 10/03/15 14:52, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> > On 10/01/15 09:07, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> >> Hi Phil,
> >>
> >> What is in your web logs and postfix logs? Postfix is pretty good about
> >>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:27:07PM +0200, Marco wrote:
> > Dear DSPAM users,
> >
> > While working on an upgrade to the current DSPAM, I noticed that
>
> Good this!
> Are you developing a Redis driver? :)
>
> Best Regards
> Marco
>
Hi Marco,
We are not adding a new backend, just trying to shak
Dear DSPAM users,
While working on an upgrade to the current DSPAM, I noticed that
the status screen with the bar charts of 24 hour and daily activity
was taking a long time to display. Although we process a lot of
messages in a 24-day period, it was slower than I expected it to
be. After running
>
>
> I've got some old notes about "received invalid result (!DSR_ISSPAM &&
> !DSR_ISINNOCENT): -2" happening with the --user parameter was a
> fully-qualified mail address, not the local user.
>
> I've checked and the mysql server is running and responds to interactive
> queries. That calli
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 09:04:31AM -0400, Yan Seiner wrote:
>
>
> On 10/2/2015 6:35 AM, Yan Seiner wrote:
> > The problem is that procmail is barfing at the -m %u - it doesn't
> > deliver the mail, crashing instead with an exit 127.
> >
> > Everything else seems to be working, except for the proc
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 07:39:21AM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> I'm having a problem with redelivery from quarantine not working. As
> far as I can tell, everything SHOULD be working. I'm not sure what I'm
> missing. It used to work, and to the best of my knowledge nothing in
> either my DSpa
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:36:49PM -0400, Al Zick wrote:
>
> >Hi Al,
> >
> >It does not look like your training is working. If you retrained 100's
> >of messages, you should have appropriate counts in the FP/FN fields.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Ken
> >
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> What do I need to do to fix this?
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:17:18AM -0700, waterdog wrote:
> Okay, I apologize for all the following questions but, the more I
> troubleshoot dspam without progress, the more questions I have.
>
> Are there recommendations/documentation on how to properly train? It seems
> that some users do corpu
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 07:17:14AM -0400, Al Zick wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are my stats after retraining 100's of messages. Both spam and ham:
>
> {227} dspam_stats -H
> antispam:
> TP True Positives: 4818
> TN True Negatives: 22115
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 05:53:02AM +, John Kenyon wrote:
> Hi Dspam Admins,
>
> Has anyone experienced issues with the DSPAM signature
> (signatureLocation=message) breaking attachments?
>
> On occasion we receive messages that contain attachments only, the headers
> will specify "Content-
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 08:14:07AM -0400, Allen B. Riddell wrote:
> Hi Dspam-users,
>
> Are there any recommended settings for someone who is willing (and
> interested in) accepting a much higher rate of false positives (even as
> high as 10%) in order to reduce the false negative rate? I don't se
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 06:43:00PM -0300, Alfredo Saldanha wrote:
> Hello Ken,
> Thank you again.
> I made another test with another sender and I can see the token now.
>
> But my real problem is another thing. I have a client that has a web form, it
> works fine, the message goes directly to inb
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 03:38:26PM -0300, Alfredo Saldanha wrote:
> I've been used dspam_crc to get token information.
> I get the "from" by system.log in dspam directory as below:
>
> 1434635458I "DOUGLAS TORRES "
> 321,5582ccc2180614948014227 Lida:_ORÇAMENTO_DE_SEGURO_AUTOMÓ
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:01:46PM -0300, Alfredo Saldanha wrote:
> Hi ktm,
>
> Thank you for your answer.
> How can I get the token information from this signature?
>
> BR.
>
In the MySQL schema, they are stored in the 'data' field in
the signature table. You can also look in the token table
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:36:11AM -0300, Alfredo Saldanha wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> According I've readed in DSpam documentation every token should be recorded
> in database with spam and ham hits.
> It's not happening here, at least in my configuration.
>
> DSpam version: http://dpaste.com/0R
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 04:03:53PM -0400, Al Zick wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't understand why dspam does some of the things it does.
>
> First, can someone verify for me that there is a retraining issue
> with dspam if using a hash driver with toe?
>
> Second, filtering doesn't work if I am using
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 01:32:19PM -0400, Allen B. Riddell wrote:
> Hi dspam-users,
>
> I'm digging into the dspam settings for the first time and would like to
> customize some of the defaults for a new and low-volume mail server
> (< 10 users) where space, memory, and CPU aren't an issue. Are th
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 06:53:24PM +0300, Орхан Касумов wrote:
> The problem is, I can't achieve full redundancy and avoid the single point
> of failure.
> Currently my setup consists of all separate VMs grouped in two chains:
>
> MX1=> DSPAM1 => IMAP1
> MX2=> DSPAM2 => IMAP2
>
> Any node in on
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 04:00:03PM +0300, Орхан Касумов wrote:
> A colleague of mine said that the way I'm training DSPAM is not correct.
> In my setup, when a user moves a message from "Inbox" folder to "DSPAM"
> folder or vice versa,
> DSPAM client installed on the same VM as the IMAP server co
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:08:56PM +0300, Орхан Касумов wrote:
>
> In my setup, DSPAM server receives mails from several MX servers and relays
> them to a single IMAP server.
> The IMAP server's:
> - IP address is the "DeliveryHost"
> - and its DNS name is the "DeliveryIdent"
> in DSPAM's configu
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:03:54AM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 03/25/15 08:48, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:39:43AM -0300, j...@7lan.net wrote:
> >> I'm planning to put it in a sql backend. What database does dspam works
> >> bett
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:39:43AM -0300, j...@7lan.net wrote:
> >>
> >> I tryed to use postgresql driver, but it used a lot of resources.
> >>
> >> Can you guys give me some suggestions? The database is getting bigger
> >> and I don't know if I'm doing the best maintenance routine.
> >>
> >> Th
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 03:57:01PM -0300, j...@7lan.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using DSPAM in a 100.000 users e-email structure. I run 6 mail
> server with dspam with the hash driver. The database is kept in a NFS
> share and it seems to work fine.
>
> I'm using TOE training mode, since I have am
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:11:43PM -0600, Eric Broch wrote:
> On 3/10/2015 10:25 AM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 05:17:36PM +0100, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>> Do DSPAM headers get added to your messages?
> >&g
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 05:17:36PM +0100, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Do DSPAM headers get added to your messages?
>
> Yes, they are.
>
> > We see poor tagging most often as a result of
> > using
> > the TEFT (train on everything) setting. That is good for initial learning
> > but
> >
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:02:50PM +0100, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it seems that my dspam does not work like expected any more. It did once, but
>
> now, for a long time nothing has been automatically marked as spam, even if
> the spam emails are very similar to what I have defined
Yes.
Ken
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 07:50:47PM +0300, Орхан Касумов wrote:
> Hello, is this list alive?
>
>
> --
> Орхан Касумов
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 10:20:45AM -0500, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On the subject of Dspam and its status ... I've wished for a long time
> for a feature to manually whitelist a sender via the web interface. I'm
> starting to look at the code to see if i can figure out how to implement
> this, but
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:07:09PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 02.12.2014 um 21:41 schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
> >On 02-12-14 21:17, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >>Am 02.12.2014 um 18:44 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
> >>>Martin Wheldon skrev den 2014-12-01 16:11:
> >>>
> I would be interested, I've
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 05:48:37PM -0600, Sparr wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> > Or are you using train on error / TOE ?
>
> Problem solved! "TrainPristine on" was preventing writes of signature
> data to the db, which causes all sorts of things that rely on the
>
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 05:00:23PM -0600, Sparr wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Sparr wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:48 PM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> >>> 5398: [11/20/2014 13:34:09] saving signature as 546e423153989760964788
> >>
> >> Well, it
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 09:22:12PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> maybe time to switch to a different solution
>
> i considered dspam months ago but by lack of upstream developemnt
> over years as well as a open mail from a developer that there is no
> real maintainance i happily used
> postscreen/
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:38:09PM -0600, Sparr wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:56 PM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 02:14:15PM -0600, Sparr wrote:
> >> I've enabled debugging and in my debug log I can see a db error:
> >>
> >> _d
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 02:14:15PM -0600, Sparr wrote:
> I've enabled debugging and in my debug log I can see a db error:
>
> _ds_get_signature: mysql_fetch_row() failed
>
> I've checked the dspam_signature_data table and it has about 14k rows
> in it, *far* fewer than the number of emails I've e
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 01:47:59PM +0200, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> On 02.09.2014 23:59, Eric Broch wrote:
> >Hi Stevan,
> >
> Hello Eric,
>
>
> >I sent the email you requested to your private email account in a
> >zip file.
> >
> I got the mail. Tested the result with normal "dspam" and with
> "dspa
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 08:58:03AM -0600, Eric Broch wrote:
> On 4/28/2014 9:50 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> > On 04/28/14 11:18, Eric Broch wrote:
> >> Hello list,
> >>
> >> I installed DSPAM on a server and recently attachments are being
> >> stripped from email. At present I haven't been able to
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:27:17PM -0700, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone attempted an upgrade of 3.6.8 to 3.10.2? We've got a
> sizable token database. Our configuration is:
>
> Algorithm: graham burton
> P-Value: graham
>
> MySQL backend. Ubuntu 10.04
>
>
> Just curious if t
Hi Jason,
I think that tokens for non-HTML are the same so you would have
minimal effects on accuracy. Since HTML is processed differently,
you accuracy could change based on what tokens are currently
being used to categorize a message. You could run a comparision
by using the same tokens with the
Hi,
The web interface is klunky, but the code problems relate more to
DoS problems with very large quarantine sizes since it reads the
entire mailbox into memory. It used to be a real problem back when
machines had a few megabytes of memory, not so much when it is in
the gigabytes. :) This is so l
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 02:22:36PM +0200, Marco wrote:
>
> > Your best bet is to increase the granularity of the SQL statements that
> > you are running to make the time taken per piece short enough to prevent
> > scanning problems. We currently process by first letter of the account
> > to break
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 10:00:52AM +0200, Marco wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a slow performance on my dspam-mysql conf. The purge nightly
> script take 7-12 hours to complete. During this time I see a lot of
> locks
>
> [07/02/2014 09:28:35] 32082: Lock wait timeout exceeded; try
> restarting
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 08:46:51PM +0100, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
> On 17 Jun 2014, at 20:00, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> > On 17-06-14 19:46, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
> >> [06/17/2014 16:08:11] Burton-Bayesian Probability: 0.50
> >> Samples: 27 11933: [06/17/2014 16:08:11] no factors specifi
Hi Roman,
Delete your cookie or close your browser, if it is configured to delete
your cookies on exit. There are new browser releases that are "helpful"
and keep your cookies around between invocations.
Regards,
Ken
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:55:19AM -0500, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> How can I logo
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 08:39:08PM +0800, Puah Chee Hau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question.
>
> Currently the dspam signature is !DSPAM:52ef87c8289368532613004!
>
> Can I change the !DSPAM to something else? This is more for branding purpose.
> =)
>
> Thanks
Hi,
I would recommend not inserti
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:35:43PM +0100, Patrick Laimbock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On a CentOS 6.5 x86_64 box I'm using DSPAM 3.10.2 and SELinux is in
> permissive mode. The problem is that DSPAM segfaults:
>
> Jan 27 22:01:02 vps kernel: dspam[5621]: segfault at 29 ip
> 7f3b55a2612c sp 7f3b53
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 01:03:36PM -0500, Elvar wrote:
>
> On 7/10/2013 10:21 PM, P.V.Anthony wrote:
> > On 11/07/2013 01:31, Elvar wrote:
> >> I apologize for taking so long to reply but here it finally is. I have
> >> been aggressively training since my last email over a month ago and
> >> while
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 04:51:10PM -0300, Alfredo Saldanha wrote:
> Ok, how can I use signature-less?
> Another question: I need to truncate the tables and restart from the scratch ?
> In your opinion, what is the best dspam setup (dspam, mysql, postfix, etc.)
> to my case?
>
Hi Alfredo,
Signat
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 03:57:15PM -0300, Alfredo Saldanha wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> My space should be tokens, I think...
>
> mysql> select count(*) from dspam_token_data;
>
>
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 02:28:09PM -0300, Alfredo Saldanha wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> In my structure I have 8 MX servers making load balance, 70 thousand email
> accounts with, around 2,5 million messages per day.
> I have 3 slaves MySQL servers receiving dspam read access and one master with
> dsp
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:31:25PM -0500, c cc wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Thank you so much--it works, except there is no graph. Am I missing
> something? Thanks!
>
> Charles
>
Hi Charles,
>From the README:
GD Graphing Library
If you plan on leaving DSPAM's logging function enabled, and would
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:53:45AM -0700, David Rees wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:30 AM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> > You have just been whammied by the "TEFT-is-a-bad-bad-idea" problem. I
> > suspect
> > that if you look at the tokens involved, because
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:24:04AM -0700, David Rees wrote:
> I've run into a situation where I get emails that so stubborn that
> even after repeated training they still classify as spam when they
> should be innocent.
>
> I have always retrained these messages when I've found them in my spam fol
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 10:07:31PM +0200, Holger wrote:
> On 05.08.2012 20:37, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 04:19:44PM +0200, Holger wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >
> > You need to use dspam-3.10.2. It includes support for PostgreSQ
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 04:19:44PM +0200, Holger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I try to migrate to a new server. On the new server an Ubuntu 12.04 is
> running. The DSPAM version is 3.10.1, installed from the Ubuntu
> Repositories. PostgreSQL is in version 9.1 installed, also via Ubuntu
> Repositories.
> The p
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:40:12AM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 08/02/2012 09:11 AM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
>
> > Here is the update to exim.txt and dspam.conf.in:
>
> Could you send those diffs as diff -u ? that way my mailer won't confuse
> part of it as
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:20:46PM +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> On 8/2/12 2:50 PM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jasper,
> >
> > I am glad that you found the proper exim option. We need to get that
> > included
> > in the next release version of the
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 01:46:37AM +0100, Jasper Wallace wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, k...@rice.edu wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:19:11PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> > > On 07/31/2012 04:02 PM, Jasper Wallace wrote:
> > > >> You know what
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:19:11PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 04:02 PM, Jasper Wallace wrote:
> >> You know what is funny? You are the second one (I remember) having
> >> something like this. The other person has Exim too and uses Debian too.
> >>
> >> @Julien: Is that case s
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:11:04PM +0200, Hanno Hirschberger wrote:
> Hello Martin,
>
> thank you very much for your answer. I found out that it was indeed
> not a problem with DSPAM. The server sending the mail to DSPAM was not
> capable of sending the + detail correctly because it uses sendmail.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 02:38:20PM -0500, Chad M Stewart wrote:
>
> I want to implement a sieve type filter, after dspam has processed the
> messages. In other words, if dspam marks the message as spam and has a high
> degree of confidence, then silently discard the message. Unfortunately
> P
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 08:55:11PM +0100, Paul Cockings wrote:
> On 18/04/2012 20:45, Steve Fatula wrote:
> >
> >
> >On my setup DSPAM is disabled for most users as they don't need
> >it, the checks that are in place at the MTA are sufficient enough
> >for those users to receive a very
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 10:27:58PM +, Sven wrote:
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392407
> > If you know Gentoo devs then you know that just opening bug reports is
> > not going to accelerate things. On the other hand adding a new
> > revision of the Ebuild that includes the
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 08:14:26PM +, Sven wrote:
> Tom Hendrikx whyscream.net> writes:
> > On a side note, I noticed DSPAM 3.10.1 made it to stable on gentoo this
> > week. Cake time :)
>
> Since both Postgres 9.1.1 and dspam 3.10.1 are stable on Gentoo now, people
> will
> loose mails here
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:21:50AM -0700, Dudi Goldenberg wrote:
> Is there a way to show Date/time instead of DOW/time in the history pages?
>
> For low volume mailboxes, you can have several msgs with "Wed xx:yy" time
> stamps, where some of them are too old and can nom be retrained (like
> We
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 09:03:22AM -0400, Julien Vehent wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:30:56 -0400, Julien Vehent wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 07:42:42 +0200, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> >> DSPAM is freeing memory when not used any more. Off course some
> >> things
> >> stay permanently in memory (
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:39:13AM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> Hello,
>
>I am having an issue with postfix / dspam / cyrus and cyrus' sieve
> filtering.
>
>The issue is that by the time cyrus gets the message Return-Path is
> empty.
>
>I've setup a VM mirroring to test this
71 matches
Mail list logo
