On 12/04/14 12:38, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> you could try to delete their whitelist token in your storage backend or
> bump their innocent counter. When I look at my instance and check for
> your name then I have this:
Zeroing the spam_hits for one of the two users APPEARS to have worked.
Observing
On 04.12.2014 18:04, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 12/04/14 11:03, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>> Hello Phil,
>>
>> DSPAM does not whitelist a sender but instead adds a special token with
>> the whole FROM line.
>> So "From: ste...@bajic.ch" will be translated to "From*ste...@bajic.ch".
>> The problem with a
On 12/04/14 11:03, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> Hello Phil,
>
> DSPAM does not whitelist a sender but instead adds a special token with
> the whole FROM line.
> So "From: ste...@bajic.ch" will be translated to "From*ste...@bajic.ch".
> The problem with a whitelisting functionality in the WebUI is that
Hello Phil,
DSPAM does not whitelist a sender but instead adds a special token with
the whole FROM line.
So "From: ste...@bajic.ch" will be translated to "From*ste...@bajic.ch".
The problem with a whitelisting functionality in the WebUI is that the
from line could be:
From: "Stevan Bajić"->
On the subject of Dspam and its status ... I've wished for a long time
for a feature to manually whitelist a sender via the web interface. I'm
starting to look at the code to see if i can figure out how to implement
this, but I'd appreciate it if someone with a good level of familiarity
with the c
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 10:20:45AM -0500, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On the subject of Dspam and its status ... I've wished for a long time
> for a feature to manually whitelist a sender via the web interface. I'm
> starting to look at the code to see if i can figure out how to implement
> this, but
