On Fri, 1 May 2009 07:20:31 pm Doug Laidlaw wrote:
> On Friday 24 April 2009 9:41:43 am Doug Laidlaw wrote:
> > On Friday 24 April 2009 7:23:19 am RW wrote:
> > > If you are using dspam as a filter, I can't see how you could get away
> > > with not having --stdout. I don't recognise --deliver-spam,
On Friday 24 April 2009 9:41:43 am Doug Laidlaw wrote:
> On Friday 24 April 2009 7:23:19 am RW wrote:
> > If you are using dspam as a filter, I can't see how you could get away
> > with not having --stdout. I don't recognise --deliver-spam, but if you
> > meant --deliver=spam then I think that woul
On Friday 24 April 2009 9:41:43 am Doug Laidlaw wrote:
> On Friday 24 April 2009 7:23:19 am RW wrote:
> > If you are using dspam as a filter, I can't see how you could get away
> > with not having --stdout. I don't recognise --deliver-spam, but if you
> > meant --deliver=spam then I think that woul
On Friday 24 April 2009 7:23:19 am RW wrote:
> If you are using dspam as a filter, I can't see how you could get away
> with not having --stdout. I don't recognise --deliver-spam, but if you
> meant --deliver=spam then I think that would mean discard ham.
I did have --stdout originally, but though
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:48:01 +1000
Doug Laidlaw wrote:
> I am new to dspam. Mine is a simple workstation, not a server. I
> have tried white-listing, but find that it causes more problems than
> it solves. I have been running SpamAssassin, but it seems powerless
> to filter any of the current
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 8:04:09 pm Doug Laidlaw wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 April 2009 7:42:18 pm Hugo Monteiro wrote:
> > Doug Laidlaw wrote:
> > > I am new to dspam. Mine is a simple workstation, not a server. I
> > > have tried white-listing, but find that it causes more problems than it
> >
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 7:42:18 pm Hugo Monteiro wrote:
> Doug Laidlaw wrote:
> > I am new to dspam. Mine is a simple workstation, not a server. I have
> > tried white-listing, but find that it causes more problems than it
> > solves. I have been running SpamAssassin, but it seems powerless
Doug Laidlaw wrote:
> I am new to dspam. Mine is a simple workstation, not a server. I have
> tried
> white-listing, but find that it causes more problems than it solves. I have
> been running SpamAssassin, but it seems powerless to filter any of the
> current crop of porn/Viagra spam, alth
I am new to dspam. Mine is a simple workstation, not a server. I have tried
white-listing, but find that it causes more problems than it solves. I have
been running SpamAssassin, but it seems powerless to filter any of the
current crop of porn/Viagra spam, although it does seem effective for
