On 17 Jun 2014, at 20:54, k...@rice.edu wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 08:46:51PM +0100, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
>> On 17 Jun 2014, at 20:00, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>>> On 17-06-14 19:46, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
[06/17/2014 16:08:11] Burton-Bayesian Probability: 0.50
Samples: 27
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 08:46:51PM +0100, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
> On 17 Jun 2014, at 20:00, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> > On 17-06-14 19:46, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
> >> [06/17/2014 16:08:11] Burton-Bayesian Probability: 0.50
> >> Samples: 27 11933: [06/17/2014 16:08:11] no factors specifi
On 17 Jun 2014, at 20:00, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> On 17-06-14 19:46, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
>> [06/17/2014 16:08:11] Burton-Bayesian Probability: 0.50
>> Samples: 27 11933: [06/17/2014 16:08:11] no factors specified;
>> using default 11933: [06/17/2014 16:08:11] Result Confidence: 0.50
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17-06-14 19:46, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Hope someone can help. I’m running into a very frustrating problem
> with a new dspam configuration. When using the hash driver with a
> virtual testing user, I get mail delivered to my t
Hello,
Hope someone can help. I’m running into a very frustrating problem with a new
dspam configuration. When using the hash driver with a virtual testing user, I
get mail delivered to my trusted MDA (for testing, /bin/cat), without X-Dspam*
headers, but only in TOE mode; in TEFT mode everyt
