Hi all,
I'am new to DSPAM, I'm trying to migrate a server from
postfix+amavis+clamav+spamassassin+dovecot to
postfix+dspam+clamav+dovecot on ubuntu 12.04 server.
Everything works as expected, except for dspam:
1) mails are scanned, but all receive the same headers and none is set
to spam (spam
On 11/25/2010 11:29 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> On 25/11/10 12:04, Hugo Monteiro wrote:
>
>> On 11/25/2010 08:53 AM, Christoph P. wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
In that case you'd be marking a message by the
rules defined by spam dictionary for the first
listed recipien
On 11/25/2010 03:16 PM, Christoph P. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > When DSPAM is run, it can only process the message
> > for a single dspam UID. Otherwise, it would not be
> > possible to deploy a per-user policy on
> > the message (quarantine on/off, dspam results in
> > headers or subject, etc). I'm not
Hello,
> When DSPAM is run, it can only process the message
> for a single dspam UID. Otherwise, it would not be
> possible to deploy a per-user policy on
> the message (quarantine on/off, dspam results in
> headers or subject, etc). I'm not sure how DSPAM
> works when it reads recipients from th
Hello,
> Like i said, it's ONE message. The DSPAM status
> headers will be appended to this message. Does it
> make any sense to have ONE message with multiple
> DSPAM status, depending on the listed recipients?
> If you demultiplex that message, before feeding it
> to DSPAM, then it will run one
On 25/11/10 12:04, Hugo Monteiro wrote:
> On 11/25/2010 08:53 AM, Christoph P. wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>> In that case you'd be marking a message by the
>>> rules defined by spam dictionary for the first
>>> listed recipient. Are you sure you want to do this?
>>
>> So, if dspam is delivering via LMTP,
On 11/25/2010 08:53 AM, Christoph P. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > In that case you'd be marking a message by the
> > rules defined by spam dictionary for the first
> > listed recipient. Are you sure you want to do this?
>
> So, if dspam is delivering via LMTP,
>
From what i recall, it really doesn't mat
On 11/25/2010 08:53 AM, Christoph P. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > In that case you'd be marking a message by the
> > rules defined by spam dictionary for the first
> > listed recipient. Are you sure you want to do this?
>
> So, if dspam is delivering via LMTP,
>
From what i recall, it really doesn't mat
Hello,
> In that case you'd be marking a message by the
> rules defined by spam dictionary for the first
> listed recipient. Are you sure you want to do this?
So, if dspam is delivering via LMTP, it does not
perform one check for each RCPT TO address, but only
one check for all addresses? And it
Hello,
> In that case you'd be marking a message by the
> rules defined by spam dictionary for the first
> listed recipient. Are you sure you want to do this?
So, if dspam is delivering via LMTP, it does not
perform one check for each RCPT TO address, but only
one check for all addresses? And it
Hello,
> In that case you'd be marking a message by the
> rules defined by spam dictionary for the first
> listed recipient. Are you sure you want to do this?
So, if dspam is delivering via LMTP, it does not
perform one check for each RCPT TO address, but only
one check for all addresses? And it
Hello,
> In that case you'd be marking a message by the
> rules defined by spam dictionary for the first
> listed recipient. Are you sure you want to do this?
So, if dspam is delivering via LMTP, it does not
perform one check for each RCPT TO address, but only
one check for all addresses? And it
On 11/24/2010 10:05 PM, Christoph P. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Is this a requirement to use LTMP for this?
> > If not, you can directly use dovecot's LDA
> > as described in [0].
>
> It is not a requirement, but deliver can only take
> one recipient address as argument. So, if the message
> has several
Hello,
> Is this a requirement to use LTMP for this?
> If not, you can directly use dovecot's LDA
> as described in [0].
It is not a requirement, but deliver can only take
one recipient address as argument. So, if the message
has several local recipients, deliver must be called several times, onc
Hi,
Le mercredi 24 nov. 2010 à 08:55:13 (-0800), Christoph P. a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> > DSPAM should be receiving from your mail server,
> > and then sending back to the mail server. The first
> > one works in LMTP, the second should be AFAIK in
> > SMTP mode.
>
> My setup is different. The inten
Hello,
> DSPAM should be receiving from your mail server,
> and then sending back to the mail server. The first
> one works in LMTP, the second should be AFAIK in
> SMTP mode.
My setup is different. The intention is that dspam receives messages for local
users from postfix via LMTP (this already
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 03:31:13 -0800, "Christoph P." wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hi Christoph,
> I have configured DSPAM to receive and deliver by LMTP. The daemon is working
> in standard LMTP mode.
What is in LMTP mode exactly ?
DSPAM should be receiving from your mail server, and then sending back to
Hello,
I have configured DSPAM to receive and deliver by LMTP. The daemon is working
in standard LMTP mode.
I have a question about some other configuration parameters: When receiving and
delivering by LMTP, do I have to enable ParseToHeaders, ChangeModeOnParse,
ChangeUserOnParse or ServerPara
18 matches
Mail list logo
