Re: [Dspam-user] Merged Group

2010-02-02 Thread Steve
> DSPAM Virtual UID. > Yes. You should add the group into the DSPAM virtual table. > Does this mean that I need to periodically run dspam_merge? > No. You can but you don't need. I would suggest you to NOT do dspam_merge. I would suggest to make a honey pot and capture Spam and feed that Spam

Re: [Dspam-user] Merged Group

2010-02-02 Thread Roman Gelfand
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Steve wrote: >> Does the rule of "Any user who has less than 1000 innocent messages or >> 250 spam messages in >>   their corpus, or whose filter is uncertain about a particular message >> will >>   consult the global dictionary for an answer." apply to merged grou

Re: [Dspam-user] Merged Group

2010-02-02 Thread Steve
> Does the rule of "Any user who has less than 1000 innocent messages or > 250 spam messages in > their corpus, or whose filter is uncertain about a particular message > will > consult the global dictionary for an answer." apply to merged groups? > No. User tokens will ALWAYS be merged togethe

[Dspam-user] Merged Group

2010-02-02 Thread Roman Gelfand
Does the rule of "Any user who has less than 1000 innocent messages or 250 spam messages in their corpus, or whose filter is uncertain about a particular message will consult the global dictionary for an answer." apply to merged groups? Does the user that represents merged group, not the users