>> (...)
>> if (x > h) x = NULL [2]
>> ---
>>
>> For this last line [2], I understand that the goal is to ignore any
>> "spam-" or similar, if it is "after" a double CRLF ("empty line"), which
>> is probably intended to encode the headers/body boundary.
> Hi all,
>
Hello,
> I'm afraid I found kinda bug in the code which handles the detection of
> "spam-...@domain", to trigger retraining to false positives/negatives.
>
> Remember I had been struggling around this for days? Dspam was never
> considering my forwards to spam-cyri...@xxx, just doing
Hi all,
I'm afraid I found kinda bug in the code which handles the detection of
"spam-...@domain", to trigger retraining to false positives/negatives.
Remember I had been struggling around this for days? Dspam was never
considering my forwards to spam-cyri...@xxx, just doing nothing, thus
never "
