On 01/07/2018 03:35 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
> On 07.01.2018 21:05, ITwrx.org wrote:
>> On 01/07/2018 01:38 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
>>> You are right. There is practically no activity for the project any
>>> more. If you need/want more support then rspamd is probably a
On 07.01.2018 21:05, ITwrx.org wrote:
On 01/07/2018 01:38 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
You are right. There is practically no activity for the project any
more. If you need/want more support then rspamd is probably a better
choice.
It's a shame, because besides this one false positive
On 01/07/2018 01:38 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
> You are right. There is practically no activity for the project any
> more. If you need/want more support then rspamd is probably a better
> choice.
It's a shame, because besides this one false positive i can't retrain,
dspam is basicall
On 07.01.2018 03:10, ITwrx.org wrote:
On 01/06/2018 07:18 PM, ITwrx.org wrote:
On 01/06/2018 05:20 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
How the heck is this possible?
i don't know. :)
Did you changed the email address to be the one with the uid 22?
yes, i sure did.
--
On 07.01.2018 02:18, ITwrx.org wrote:
On 01/06/2018 05:20 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
How the heck is this possible?
i don't know. :)
Did you changed the email address to be the one with the uid 22?
yes, i sure did.
This is strange.
-
On 01/06/2018 07:18 PM, ITwrx.org wrote:
> On 01/06/2018 05:20 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
>> How the heck is this possible?
> i don't know. :)
>> Did you changed the email address to be the one with the uid 22?
> yes, i sure did.
>
>
> --
On 01/06/2018 05:20 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
> How the heck is this possible?
i don't know. :)
> Did you changed the email address to be the one with the uid 22?
yes, i sure did.
--
Check out the vibrant t
On 07.01.2018 00:17, ITwrx.org wrote:
On 01/06/2018 04:18 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
Bingo. So the signature is there. What happens now when you run the
retrain command again by hand:
/usr/bin/dspam --user the_email_using_uid...@itwrx.org --source=error
--signature=a4410811219173565
On 01/06/2018 04:18 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
> Bingo. So the signature is there. What happens now when you run the
> retrain command again by hand:
> /usr/bin/dspam --user the_email_using_uid...@itwrx.org --source=error
> --signature=a441081121917356521135 --class=innocent
>
> Does th
On 06.01.2018 17:24, ITwrx.org wrote:
On 01/05/2018 05:32 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
So DSPAM can not find the signature in the db. Are you sure that the
signature is inside the db?
When you run this against the DSPAM database (I assume the email
address you use is i...@itwrx.org. I
On 01/05/2018 05:32 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
> So DSPAM can not find the signature in the db. Are you sure that the
> signature is inside the db?
>
> When you run this against the DSPAM database (I assume the email
> address you use is i...@itwrx.org. If not, change it to whatever you
On 06.01.2018 02:00, ITwrx.org wrote:
On 01/05/2018 05:32 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
So DSPAM can not find the signature in the db. Are you sure that the
signature is inside the db?
When you run this against the DSPAM database (I assume the email
address you use is i...@itwrx.org. I
On 01/05/2018 05:32 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
> So DSPAM can not find the signature in the db. Are you sure that the
> signature is inside the db?
>
> When you run this against the DSPAM database (I assume the email
> address you use is i...@itwrx.org. If not, change it to whatever you
On 06.01.2018 00:33, ITwrx.org wrote:
On 01/05/2018 05:07 PM, Paul Goyette wrote:
Perhaps remove the extra % character?
that gives me:
dspam[25458]: Signature retrieval for 'imap' failed
Jan 05 17:31:00 email.itwrx.org dspam[25458]: Unable to find a valid
signature. Aborting.
Jan 05 17:31:00
On 06.01.2018 00:07, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, ITwrx.org wrote:
Signature retrieval for '%s' failed
dspam[25001]: Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting.
dspam[25001]: process_message returned error -5. dropping message.
the signature is always shown as '%s' in the log (for
On 01/05/2018 05:07 PM, Paul Goyette wrote:
> Perhaps remove the extra % character?
that gives me:
> dspam[25458]: Signature retrieval for 'imap' failed
> Jan 05 17:31:00 email.itwrx.org dspam[25458]: Unable to find a valid
> signature. Aborting.
> Jan 05 17:31:00 email.itwrx.org dspam[25458]: pr
So DSPAM can not find the signature in the db. Are you sure that the
signature is inside the db?
When you run this against the DSPAM database (I assume the email address
you use is i...@itwrx.org. If not, change it to whatever your email is):
select uid,signature from dspam_signature_data whe
On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, ITwrx.org wrote:
Signature retrieval for '%s' failed
dspam[25001]: Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting.
dspam[25001]: process_message returned error -5. dropping message.
the signature is always shown as '%s' in the log (for all messages i
move). so, either there is
On 01/05/2018 03:46 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
> Assuming the mail you try to reclassify is for your own account (aka:
> i...@itwrx.org) then the following lines inside the plugin configuration:
>
> antispam_dspam_binary = /usr/bin/dspam
> antispam_dspam_args = --user;%u;--sourc
Assuming the mail you try to reclassify is for your own account (aka:
i...@itwrx.org) then the following lines inside the plugin configuration:
antispam_dspam_binary = /usr/bin/dspam
antispam_dspam_args = --user;%u;--source=error;--signature=%%s
antispam_dspam_spam = --class=spam
On 01/05/2018 02:03 AM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
> Can you please post the header of the message that you are trying to
> retrain? Just the one beginning with "X-DSPAM".
>
sure, thanks.
> X-DSPAM-Result: Spam
> X-DSPAM-Processed: Wed Dec 27 15:28:33 2017
> X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9899
> X-
Can you please post the header of the message that you are trying to
retrain? Just the one beginning with "X-DSPAM".
--
Kind Regards from Switzerland,
Stevan Bajić
On 05.01.2018 03:50, ITwrx.org wrote:
On 01/04/2018 05:05 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
Can you post your configurat
On 01/04/2018 05:05 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
> Can you post your configuration of the plugin?
>
> And can you post the following entries from your dspam.conf?
> MySQLUIDInSignature
> Preference
> ParseToHeaders
> ChangeModeOnParse
> ChangeUserOnParse
>
> If your config is in one file
Hello,
thunderbird is not doing much in this game. The whole work is done by
the dovecot antispam plugin. You need to look at your dovecot
configuration and see if you can find the configuration for the antispam
plugin. Usually it resists in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/
A working configuration for a
On 01/04/2018 01:17 PM, Stevan Bajić via Dspam-user wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> you need to post more information. How does DSPAM know that you moved
> from spam to inbox? Do you have a plugin or anything else that detects
> the re-classification?
>
>
Hi,
i'm not sure how that part works so maybe i just
Hello,
you need to post more information. How does DSPAM know that you moved
from spam to inbox? Do you have a plugin or anything else that detects
the re-classification?
--
Kind Regards from Switzerland,
Stevan Bajić
On 04.01.2018 17:49, ITwrx.org wrote:
when moving ham from thunderb
when moving ham from thunderbird's junk folder(by marking it as "not
junk") dspam never learns and continually marks new messages from same
sender as spam.
dspam log shows
> Unable to find a valid signature. Aborting.
> process_message returned error 114. dropping message.
systemd journal shows:
27 matches
Mail list logo
