Re: [dspam-users] dspam training

2007-08-05 Thread Matt Richards
Raj wrote: > hi tony > > changing over to teft gives me better results now > > all the spam related to the one i discussed below > http://24x7server.net/spam.html concering USNMA is getting caught correctly > I get those exact same messages, although I just gave a couple to dspam as spam and now

Re: [dspam-users] Dspam and mysql performance problems.

2007-08-05 Thread Tony Earnshaw
Vini Engel skrev, on 05-08-2007 19:13: [] Also, you may want to consider changing the dspam tables from MyISAM to InnoDB. InnoDB is more transaction-oriented and will likely be faster in this case, due to row-level locking vs. MyISAM's table-level locking. The locking issue is particula

Re: [dspam-users] Dspam and mysql performance problems.

2007-08-05 Thread Vini Engel
Mark Dadgar said the following on 03/08/07 01:56: On Aug 2, 2007, at 8:19 AM, Vini Engel wrote: I have been running dspam for sometime on one of my servers and started to experience slowness on the message delivery. When I listed the processes running on my server I saw hundreds of dspam process

Re: [dspam-users] dspam training

2007-08-05 Thread Tony Earnshaw
Raj skrev, on 05-08-2007 17:58: changing over to teft gives me better results now all the spam related to the one i discussed below http://24x7server.net/spam.html concering USNMA is getting caught correctly thanks for your help You're welcome :) --Tonni -- Tony Earnshaw Email: tonni at he

Re: [dspam-users] dspam training

2007-08-05 Thread Raj
hi tony changing over to teft gives me better results now all the spam related to the one i discussed below http://24x7server.net/spam.html concering USNMA is getting caught correctly thanks for your help rajesh -- Original Message -- From: Tony Earnsh