[dspam-users] seg fault

Hi, we have been happily running dspam 3.8.0 ever since it was released without problems. Now, today all of a sudden, I am getting either a segmentation fault, or a floating point exception. It will run for a few (between 1 and 5) minutes and then crash. Has anyone come across this before? We use p

Re: [dspam-users] Signature query

a two way sync, except dspam stores mailboxes as a single file so I can't simply sync all files between the two servers. Ben wrote: > Hi to all, I have a question on signatures. > > Is there any reason why a signature simply wouldn't exist? It exists in > the mail message bu

[dspam-users] Retraining

Hello, I have a question regaring retraining and groups. I have setup my primary account to be classification group for everyone else, so if a user's account is not mature enough then it looks at my account to work out if the mail is spam/ham. Now, lets say one of these users is getting a lot of s

[dspam-users] Signature query

Hi to all, I have a question on signatures. Is there any reason why a signature simply wouldn't exist? It exists in the mail message but it does not exist in any account on the system. It's not permission related. Other signatures exist. Because of this, I'm unable to retrain on this message. I a

[dspam-users] Keep getting messages about it being my first mail message

Hi, I'm going to try and explain a possible bug I've come across. In my group file, I have this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:shared,managed:[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] My primary email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] My temporary email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The server that dspam goes through is

Re: [dspam-users] dspam_stats produces different results than dspam_stats -H

Actually disregard this sorry! I just noticed that without the -H is is correct. I thought it read "86 FP" but the 86 is coming from the TN: part. Sorry about that. Ben wrote: > Hi, which is the correct way to run dspam_stats? Is it just dspam_stats > [EMAIL PROTECTED] or do I ru

[dspam-users] dspam_stats produces different results than dspam_stats -H

Hi, which is the correct way to run dspam_stats? Is it just dspam_stats [EMAIL PROTECTED] or do I run dspam_stats -H [EMAIL PROTECTED] Example: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# dspam_stats -H [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: TP True Positives: 0 TN True Negati

[dspam-users] Groups

Hi, I have a question regarding groups. Lets say we have a server that hosts domain.com. Is it possible to add a particular set of users to one group, so for example, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] all share the same group / dictionary? I know that you can do this with