Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:43:15 +0200
> Von: "Bartlomiej Moczulski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: [dspam-users] what\'s in dspam_signature_data?
> hi everyone,
> short question to those, who mastered dspam's sour
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:38:13 -0500
> Von: Charles Steinkuehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: [dspam-users] Site-wide filtering at smtp time
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm looking at
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:07:01 -0700
> Von: Tom Bombadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: [dspam-users] avoid writing dspam_signature_data table
> Hi all...
>
Hallo Tom
I needed to go back to see what you original
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:35:50 -0700
> Von: Tom Bombadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: Tony Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] avoid writing dspam_signature_data table
>
> > Start over and thi
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:07:01 -0700
> Von: Tom Bombadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: [dspam-users] avoid writing dspam_signature_data table
> Hi all...
>
> Is it possible to make dspam just to classify the me
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:06:26 +0800
> Von: Xueron Nee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] DSPAM Does Nothing?
> Hi steveee,
>
> Than
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:26:52 +0800
> Von: Xueron Nee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: gabrielle singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: Brian Muramatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] DSPAM Does Nothing?
> Hi g
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:25:42 +0200
> Von: Elias Oltmanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: Daniel Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] [RFC] Signature leakage and its consequences
> Daniel Rose <[EMAIL
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:55:50 +0200
> Von: Elias Oltmanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] [RFC] Signature leakage and its consequences
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:20:10 +0200
> Von: "Sven Kloe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] wich group to use?
>
> > > There are E-Mailaliases in a LDAP-Tree (I don't know if I can query
> the
> > >
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:24:49 +0200
> Von: "Sven Kloe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] wich group to use?
> > > So many groups and no clue which one/ which combination to use :(
> > What do you w
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:29:22 +0200
> Von: "net-lab Support[Sven Kloe]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] wich group to use?
> Am Donnerstag, 23. August 2007 11:07 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > -
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:40:16 +0200
> Von: Elias Oltmanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] [RFC] Signature leakage and its consequences
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:49:38 +0200
> Von: Sven Kloe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: DSpam Users
> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] wich group to use?
> Hi all,
>
> I don't know exact wich group should be used in which context.
>
> I use dspam with several Domain
> >> (like SASL) and check afterwards whether the authenticated user is
> >> permitted to retrain the data of the user specified in the uid part of
> >> the signature. This would require postfix to parse the message with a
> >> similar algorithm as DSPAM doe
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:08:31 +
> Von: "Raj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: [dspam-users] blocking ips of spam source in firewall
> Hi
>
> i want to block the ips of spam sources immediately as soon as dspa
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:06:47 +0200
> Von: Elias Oltmanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] [RFC] Signature leakage and its consequences
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Original-Nachricht -
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:52:29 +1000
> Von: Daniel Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] [RFC] Signature leakage and its consequences
> >>
> > I sent a message there. Can y
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:06:39 +1000
> Von: Daniel Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] [RFC] Signature leakage and its consequences
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Original-Nachricht ---
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:09:03 +0200
> Von: Tony Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] [RFC] Signature leakage and its consequences
> Elias Oltmanns skrev, on 21-08-2007 16:33:
>
> > it seems
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:56:32 -0700
Von: Ricardo Kleemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com"
Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] how to use the spam/innocent aliases
>
> Thanks.
> Will this o
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:54:04 -0700
Von: Dspam User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] Dspam query error???
> Hi Steve,
>
Hallo Alex
> Thanks for your reply.
> Here are my dspam.conf entries for algori
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:02:53 -0700
Von: Dspam User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
Betreff: [dspam-users] Dspam query error???
> Hello,
>
Hello
> I've installed 3.8.0-STABLE Release onto my Linux OpenSUSE 10.2 Mail
> server
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:05:32 -0700
Von: Ricardo Kleemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com"
Betreff: [dspam-users] how to use the spam/innocent aliases
> Hi,
>
Hello
> How should messages be sent to the aliases? Is it ok t
When I turn on the whitelist option in dspam.conf then my DSPAM is not working.
Does any one have the same problem? I am using DPSAM v3.8.0 on Gentoo Linux.
// Steve
--
GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS.
Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/free
I am speechless. This is the fastest DSPAM I ever had installed. Whatever you
have done to the code: It made DSPAM fly!
Thanks!
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:01:47 -0400
Von: "Jonathan A. Zdziarski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: DSPAM Users
CC: dspam development lis
Hallo
I have the feature "chained" and the 3.8.0 release is barking about that
feature to not exist anymore. But the documentation still claims that this
feature exist.
What am I overlooking?
cheers
Steve
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:01:47 -0400
Von: "Jona
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 10:02:41 +
Von: Belgarath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
CC:
Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] Whitelisting
> Hello,
>
Hi
> still I see a point of doing this on dspam level, thaty should be done
> before
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 15:49:42 +0100
Von: Marcin Krol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
CC:
Betreff: [dspam-users] Whitelisting
> Hello everyone,
>
Hallo Marcin
> Does anyone know how to get DSPAM explicitly recognize the addr
Hallo all
Has anyone downloaded trec06p and tried to run it against DSPAM?
I get on my DSPAM 3.6.8 with MySQL 5.0.32 on the following messages an error:
ham ../data/004/117
ham ../data/004/206
ham ../data/004/275
ham ../data/012/144
If any one can reproduce the error on those 4 messages, then we
30 matches
Mail list logo