On January 14, 2007 11:42:51 PM +0100 Lars Stavholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Frank Cusack wrote:
No responses? I'd have thought this would be a simple enough question.
What is dspam_clean for and what is correct maintenance when using
the hash driver?
The README (3.6.8) states that...
Ple
Frank Cusack wrote:
> No responses? I'd have thought this would be a simple enough question.
> What is dspam_clean for and what is correct maintenance when using
> the hash driver?
The README (3.6.8) states that...
[snip]
6. NIGHTLY MAINTENANCE AND HOUSEKEEPING CRONS
Non-SQL Based Nightly Pu
No responses? I'd have thought this would be a simple enough question.
What is dspam_clean for and what is correct maintenance when using
the hash driver?
-frank
On January 11, 2007 12:30:24 PM -0800 Frank Cusack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
To bring back a thread from a little more than a year
To bring back a thread from a little more than a year ago, it was
reported that for dspam compiled with only the hash driver on an
SMP box, dspam_clean would segv sometimes. Clearly a fault in
dspam_clean, and I am seeing it but on Solaris 10 x86 SMP, not
debian as the original reporter did.
Thr
