Re: [dspam-users] dspam web interface

2008-07-22 Thread Mark Rogers
Mark Rogers wrote: I've just built from CVS and checked the changelog, and as far as I can tell there's been no change that would resolve this problem. Can anyone confirm that if dspam --deliver (with --source=error) fails because of a missing signature then an error is logged but the return c

Re: [dspam-users] dspam web interface

2008-07-22 Thread Mark Rogers
Right, I've got somewhere... I've just built from CVS and checked the changelog, and as far as I can tell there's been no change that would resolve this problem. Can anyone confirm that if dspam --deliver (with --source=error) fails because of a missing signature then an error is logged but th

Re: [dspam-users] dspam web interface

2008-07-22 Thread Mark Rogers
Mark Rogers wrote: Handling of errors is minimal, but should leave the message in the quarantine if undeliverable, so I think my problem is with dspam not telling me a message can't be delivered when that is the case, but the whole processing mechanism looks to be using a huge amount of RAM on

[dspam-users] dspam web interface

2008-07-22 Thread Mark Rogers
Can someone who is running dspam 3.8.x (preferably a recent CVS) please email me a copy of the the web interface files (dspam.cgi/admin.cgi/etc)? I'm still trying to get my head around the way the web interface is losing mail (on my 3.6.8 Debian/Ubuntu install), but looks like the problem is w