[DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-17 Thread Ben Ramler
Hi group It came to me to look at the 91AD. Is there any difference between the 91AD and the 92AD? Maybe instead of loading up (and I do mean loading up) maybe I should look at the 91AD instead. Any difference? 73, Ben

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-17 Thread Kent Hufford
: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD Hi group It came to me to look at the 91AD. Is there any difference between the 91AD and the 92AD? Maybe instead of loading up (and I do mean loading up) maybe I should look at the 91AD instead. Any difference? 73, Ben [Non-text portions of this message have

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-17 Thread David Nesbitt
Price,bells and whistles plus the all important personal preference. 73 David KD8JPO From: Ben Ramler To: D-Star Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 4:30:42 PM Subject: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD Hi group It came to me to look at the 91AD. Is there any

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-17 Thread John Hays
The key functional differences: IC91AD only has two power settings - low/high, in the low position it is often not enough to get into the repeater, in the high position the radio gets HOT (oven mitt sometimes recommended) and has a circuit to drop power when it gets too hot. IC92 has four po

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-17 Thread Tony Langdon
At 07:09 AM 7/18/2009, you wrote: >92 is a true dual band. Look at the screen. You can have one DSTAR repeater >on one band and another UHF or VHF analog repeater going on the other band >at the same time. 91 can do this as well. I own a 91 and use the dual receive facility to monitor both my FM

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-17 Thread JI1BQW
In addition, what is often comes to the top of the complaint list for the 91 here is the analog volume pod which can be moved easily while it stays in your pocket. It surprises you when you turn it on next time. (I haven't heard it damaged someone's ear, though :-) If there were only the 91 and

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-17 Thread Ben Ramler
: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 6:56:19 PM Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD   In addition, what is often comes to the top of the complaint list for the 91 here is the analog volume pod which can be moved easily while it stays in your pocket. It surprises you when you

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-17 Thread JI1BQW
>the analog volume pod which can be moved easily while it > stays in your pocket. I found it funny when I re-read my own post. I meant to say it can be "turned" easily. 73, -- JI1BQW - Kay Ishikawa

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-17 Thread James Wells
I do not know much about the 91AD but I own a 92AD. So I really can't compare the two, however I can say that if you weight what you wish to spend against what you want it to do then you can get the answer. There are downsides to both. I wanted GPS. I find it funny that the Users guide uses digi

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-17 Thread James Wells
I don't know the reason but I know that the 92AD gets real hot if you talk to long on Digital. Each level of heat drops the wattage untill it will not transmit. So you have to make your comments quick and to the point. As for the reason I don't know that. I lay mine on the cooling pad that I use

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-17 Thread Ben Ramler
what if you where to install some small fans on the box lets say two do you think that would be enough to cool the radio as well as the little BD-35? 73, Ben KØBLR

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-17 Thread John D. Hays
You need to look at your application. If you are intending the radio to need higher power and be used for extended periods, get a mobile. If you need something very portable for quick status reports, get a handheld. By the time you buy a handheld and an amp, you are at least as expensive as t

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-17 Thread Gary Pearce KN4AQ
At 04:30 PM 7/17/2009, Ben Ramler wrote: > >Hi group > >It came to me to look at the 91AD. Is there any difference between the >91AD and the 92AD? Maybe instead of loading up (and I do mean loading up) >maybe I should look at the 91AD instead. Any difference? > >73, >Ben Here's a link to a page

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-17 Thread Ben Ramler
Hi Gary,     I don't see a link. you can send it to me direct if you want to. 73, Ben From: Gary Pearce KN4AQ To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 9:17:31 PM Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD   At 04:30 PM 7/17

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-17 Thread Ben Ramler
009 9:16:13 PM Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD   You need to look at your application. If you are intending the radio to need higher power and be used for extended periods, get a mobile. If you need something very portable for quick status reports, get a handheld. By the time you

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-17 Thread John D. Hays
Ben, No problem, YMMV, I wasn't suggesting the IC-80 at all, only to suggest that it shares programming software with the ID-880 mobile radio. Just for the record, the IC-80AD and ID-880 are both "dual band" (they operate on both 2m and 70cm) but they are not "dual watch" (monitoring two frequ

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-17 Thread Ben Ramler
Hays To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 9:50:02 PM Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD   Ben, No problem, YMMV, I wasn't suggesting the IC-80 at all, only to suggest that it shares programming software with the ID-880 mobile radio. Just for the reco

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-18 Thread JI1BQW
Please note that none of the current D-Star radios is capable of dual watch two DV-mode frequencies. If one is DV, another comes to FM. Dual FM is OK. 73, -- JI1BQW - Kay Ishikawa - Original Message - On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:50:02 -0700 "John D. Hays" wrote: > Ben, > > No problem, Y

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-18 Thread Ben Ramler
From: JI1BQW To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 7:23:22 AM Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD   Please note that none of the current D-Star radios is capable of dual watch two DV-mode frequencies. If one is DV, another comes to

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-18 Thread Fran Miele
s.com Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD Morning Group, let me clarify what I am after..What I am looking for is a Dual rx radio. Thank you also for clarifying what YMMV stands for. I was trying to figure out what that stood for so I asked. again thank you all very much for t

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-18 Thread Ben Ramler
Thank you Fran I will do that! From: Fran Miele To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 10:43:05 AM Subject: RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD   Buy the 2820. You won't be sorry and there have been some pretty good deals

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-18 Thread Michael A. Waldron
I own both a 91 and a 92. I bought the 92 first based mostly on the (correct) information I received when I asked the same question you did. John Hay's post is right on as far as the differences go (he's probably the one who answered my question several months ago). He gives you everything you'r

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

2009-07-18 Thread Matt Roberts
> I don't want the IC-80 because its not dual band. The IC80 is not dual band I have one and I can use it on both 2M and 70CM. YOu cannot monitor both bands at the same time, but you can put frequencies from both in the radio. I really like mine, and with the SLow setting, if i talk and liste

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD - QST Review

2009-07-18 Thread Gary Pearce KN4AQ
<<mailto:kn4aq%40arrl.net>kn...@arrl.net> >To: <mailto:dstar_digital%40yahoogroups.com>dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 9:17:31 PM >Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD > > >At 04:30 PM 7/17/2009, Ben Ramler wrote: > > > >Hi gro