--- In dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com, John Hays wrote:
> For me, the callsign of the station is the registration, no other
registration of RF units should be required.
John, I believe that it is OK in your area.
But you should agree that any pirate can visit well known web site and
monitor all
At 02:50 PM 6/25/2010, you wrote:
>I don't see any need for authentication/security protocols for
>D-star beyond what's already in place. What ever in the world for?
>We've done just fine for many years without it on analouge V/UHF
>repeaters, Echolink and etc. We don't need it anymore than we w
I don't see any need for authentication/security protocols for D-star beyond
what's already in place. What ever in the world for? We've done just fine for
many years without it on analouge V/UHF repeaters, Echolink and etc. We don't
need it anymore than we would need it on HF DX.
Bill KE7ONZ
At 06:36 AM 6/25/2010, you wrote:
>All,
>
>thanks for your replies and arguments.
>
>Authentication subject has been raised in connection with negative
>examples in analog repeater networks and AMPR in the past.
>Until then while the repeater works locally - security is a problem of
>repeater's own
On Jun 24, 2010, at 1:36 PM, ra3apw wrote:
We can assume that a weak place in security is an air interface of
local
repeater (at confidence links between Gateways).
Therefore:
- authentication can work locally on a concrete repeater
- authentication takes place only at process of registrati
All,
thanks for your replies and arguments.
Authentication subject has been raised in connection with negative
examples in analog repeater networks and AMPR in the past.
Until then while the repeater works locally - security is a problem of
repeater's owner.
But as soon as this repeater will be c
On Jun 24, 2010, at 6:55 AM, Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM wrote:
We take it for grant it, when we talk to someone on the other end of
the RF wave,
that person to is a registered and authorized Amateur Radio Operator
according to
their respective countries requirements... rather it's HF or D-St
The world is becoming a place where nobody trusts anybody. I frankly think
that's a disgusting state of affairs. Even if it's sometimes abused, the
friendly, work together attitude of ham radio is one of the best features of
the hobby. It should be one of the last things we change.
Bert Bruner
y, June 24, 2010 1:04 AM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: D-Star & air interface authentication
Thank you All for answers and clarifications.
Really the key word of my question was AIR interface (RF) authentication.
Do we have a procedure to implem
On 6/23/2010 10:04 PM, ra3apw wrote:
Thank you All for answers and clarifications.
Really the key word of my question was _AIR interface (RF) authentication.
_Do we have a procedure to implement this feature (air interface
authentication) in D-Star?
For radio digital protocol it should not b
Thank you All for answers and clarifications.
Really the key word of my question was AIR interface (RF)
authentication.
Do we have a procedure to implement this feature (air interface
authentication) in D-Star?
For radio digital protocol it should not be difficult technically.
73, Karen
RA3APW
--- In dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com, "ra3apw" wrote:
>
> Whether exist the authentication mechanism in D-Star's air interface to
> prevent access of not authorised users (without HAM radio license) and
> doubles (two or more operators under one call sign)?
>
> Thanks and 73 de Karen, RA3APW
12 matches
Mail list logo
