Ron Wright wrote:
> My concern is the attack/recovery times with digital. With a mobile
> swishing in/out in analog the recovery is very quick, instantly, but
> with digital it has to do its verification thing and takes time.
This is what larger buffers and fast DSP processing is for in the
te
ps.com
>Subject: Re: {Disarmed} RE: {Disarmed} Re: {Disarmed} [dstar_digital] First
>few key-ups garbled on Dstar Repeater
>
>This is going to need more explaining?
>
>DSTAR repeaters don't deal with 'audio' ... repeat a digital signal using
>GMS
This is going to need more explaining?
DSTAR repeaters don't deal with 'audio' ... repeat a digital signal using
GMSK on receive and transmit over an FM carrier. Audio exists on the 'user'
radios, but the DSTAR signal stays digitally encoded from the end
transmitter to the end receiver (digital e
If you compare the specs on audio RX on a Dstar system to an Analog you will
see the difference. Dstar needs a bit more of an "umpf" to receive.
As for the amplifier, yes.. 50' tower is all we can go and its, just flat
land... '
Total level 530' above sea level.
KE5KAF
