Dear Ed,
Thank you for sharing the web site information for the D-Star Calculator. This
site has help me greatly... Sincerely Walter (KI6SWA)
--- On Fri, 10/31/08, Woodrick, Ed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Woodrick, Ed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [dstar_digital] Re: radio
4YIH
From: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Barry A. Wilson
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 6:22 AM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [dstar_digital] Re: radio programming
I too know quite a few local hams that have D*STAR radios but have never
use
I listen a lot on D*STAR and actually hear many calls go unanswered. In
reality I want to respond but at the same time don't want to appear to be
hogging the system always being the one to join in for a quick conversation.
I too know quite a few local hams that have D*STAR radios but have neve
th <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: radio programming
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, October 30, 2008, 7:27 PM
At 05:49 PM 10/30/2008, Ferrell Brown wrote:
>Well lets see. I guess everybody assumes that I am a dumbass and
>don't understand D
At 05:49 PM 10/30/2008, Ferrell Brown wrote:
>Well lets see. I guess everybody assumes that I am a dumbass and
>don't understand Dstar because of my original post. Anybody that
>knows me will tell you that I am very well versed in Dstar and the
>concept it includes. I have 2 2820's 1 91AD and 1
Ferrell Brown wrote:
>
>
> Well lets see. I guess everybody assumes that I am a dumbass and don't
> understand Dstar because of my original post. Anybody that knows me will
> tell you that I am very well versed in Dstar and the concept it
> includes. I have 2 2820's 1 91AD and 1 ID-1. I also g
ECTED]>
Subject: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: radio programming
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, October 30, 2008, 1:49 PM
Steve Bosshard wrote:
> It is sad that complexity excludes many would be users.
ate
Duehr
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 1:49 PM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: radio programming
Jeff, KE9V had a nice podcast he'd done called "If we don't understand
it, we can just ignore it" that seemed to cover the reasons why the
Nate Duehr wrote:
> Jeff, KE9V had a nice podcast he'd done called "If we don't understand
> it, we can just ignore it" that seemed to cover the reasons why the
> general public has lost interest in anything technological that requires
> more than two seconds of actual thought...
Follow-up to my
Steve Bosshard wrote:
> It is sad that complexity excludes many would be users.
Especially since it's not that complex. I don't know if this says
something about hams or just the population in general. :-)
Jeff, KE9V had a nice podcast he'd done called "If we don't understand
it, we can just
10 matches
Mail list logo
