On 2023-04-04 12:22 a.m., Kyle Huey wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 12:42 PM Pedro Alves via Dwarf-discuss
> mailto:dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> On 2023-03-24 6:19 p.m., Ben Woodard via Dwarf-discuss wrote:
>
> > I will admit that in its current state
On 2023-04-04 11:09 a.m., Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 2023-04-04 12:22 a.m., Kyle Huey wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 12:42 PM Pedro Alves via Dwarf-discuss
>> mailto:dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> On 2023-03-24 6:19 p.m., Ben Woodard via Dwarf-discuss wrot
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 3:09 AM Pedro Alves wrote:
> This is introducing the need for the attribute. The audience is the
> committee, not DWARF spec readers,
> because none of this text would end up in the spec. It is just setting
> the ground.
>
Ah, ok, never mind then.
- Kyle
--
Dwarf-discu
In general I like this, I will steal / plagiarize ;-) and merge it to form a V2
Vector proposal and send it out.
There are two things that I still am trying to settle in my mind. I can see
both both ways and have yet to come up with fully convincing arguments either
way.
One is: Should it be
