On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 05:05:30PM -0500, carmen wrote:
> On Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 10:44:57PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> > On 1/23/07, carmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >On Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 09:16:07PM +, David Brooke wrote:
> > >> I have a dual head setup with 2 instances of dwm.
> >
On Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 10:44:57PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 1/23/07, carmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 09:16:07PM +, David Brooke wrote:
> >> I have a dual head setup with 2 instances of dwm.
> >
> >another longstanding bug is, if you enter the other DISPLAY o
On 1/23/07, carmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 09:16:07PM +, David Brooke wrote:
> I have a dual head setup with 2 instances of dwm.
another longstanding bug is, if you enter the other DISPLAY on the barwin, the
border of a window on that display changes to indicate fo
On Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 09:16:07PM +, David Brooke wrote:
> I have a dual head setup with 2 instances of dwm.
another longstanding bug is, if you enter the other DISPLAY on the barwin, the
border of a window on that display changes to indicate focus, but its not
actually focused, until you mo
I have a dual head setup with 2 instances of dwm.
This means I can have a client visible on one of the screens but without
it having focus.
If that client is closed remotely then the bar can either display
garbage characters in the window title field and with the tag indicators
also messed up or
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:14:05AM +0100, Philipp Neubeck wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:50:49 +
> Tener Hades <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I like this idea too. Most of the time, any second window I open in a
> > > view is of lesser overall importance than the master (even if it is
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 05:31:06AM +0100, S A wrote:
> wouldn't it be wiser to do the whole thing in Perl? some pros i see:
No, perl is contraditory to our philosophy, because perl was the
first tool which broke the Unix philosophy: do only one task,
and do it well.
perl does everything, and much
