On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Luiz Ribeiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But you're not able to
> click on the tags to switch between them.
This sort of thing is what EWMH can fix.
When I'm on a gnome workstation I share with others, I use echinus[1].
On my laptop I use dwm because I don't real
I revised the list:
> Things we need for establishing such a democratic system:
>
> 1.) Anselm to implement one
I hope he doesn't.
--
# Kurt H Maier
Why not using dzen2 instead of dwm bar? xmonad folks use it that way.
They just pipe stdout from xmonad into dzen. But you're not able to
click on the tags to switch between them.
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Henrik Holst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think an implementation of EWMH would make
I think an implementation of EWMH would make it possible to remove the
dwm panel (the one that reads stdin and displays it) from dwm code base.
In that way dwm would be smaller (or maybe just break even) and more
symmetric with how dmenu is fitted to the equation today. It would also
allowe the us
As already said, I stick with 4.7, and I have still to meet a defect in
it. So I also understand why the development has taken another
direction: at that point it was so complete and simple that it was
nearly impossible to develop it further in the same direction. :)
For the same reason, no co
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:57:04PM +0200, Mate Nagy wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:06:54PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> > I've found running separate dwm instances on subdisplays entirely
> > sufficient for my multihead needs. I don't even have time and will to
> > try and comprehend all th
> Come on it's enough now. Do you remember how this pointless discussion
> started:
>
> | Polls are stupid.
>
> I just wanted to involve the users a bit on this issue. And in fact this
> statement is stupid and not polls.
> Yes, of course. And this has to be discussed (with a certain "framewor
Christoph Lohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good evening.
Hi,
> Am Mon, 05 May 2008 20:35:38 +0200
> schrieb Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I want commented votes (as previously illustrated by example).
>
> Things we need for establishing such a democratic system:
>
>
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:06:54PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> I've found running separate dwm instances on subdisplays entirely
> sufficient for my multihead needs. I don't even have time and will to
> try and comprehend all the new DEFGEOM stuff (and neither I see a
> reason).
>
> Hence I vo
Good evening.
Am Mon, 5 May 2008 21:11:05 +0200
schrieb Christoph Lohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Things we need for establishing such a democratic system:
This is _NOT_ about the subliminal integration of UPnP and XML
into dwm!
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
Good evening.
Am Mon, 05 May 2008 20:35:38 +0200
schrieb Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I want commented votes (as previously illustrated by example).
Things we need for establishing such a democratic system:
1.) A voting register for classifying the voting population
Szabolcs Nagy dixit (2008-05-05, 20:58):
> > I want commented votes (as previously illustrated by example).
>
> -1
>
> i personally don't use multihead
> keep the code clean
I've found running separate dwm instances on subdisplays entirely
sufficient for my multihead needs. I don't even have ti
On 5/5/08, Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want commented votes (as previously illustrated by example).
-1
i personally don't use multihead
keep the code clean
2008/5/5, Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I want commented votes (as previously illustrated by example).
I want a Porsche and a new x61 tablet. And some Icecream. Also I
consider wanting some candy. How about a new flatscreen TV? Yes, I
also want a flatscreen TV.
--
http://www.gnuff
hiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, of course. And this has to be discussed (with a certain "framework"
> > of course - you can't come along and expect someone to integrate cairo
> > or so). And this is why we have to make clear what exactly sucks less.
> > I mean the term itself suggest t
1 unnecessary space after Layout definition
2 some may need lt in their config (eg i use lt->isfloating in my
pushup/down algo)
--- a/dwm.c Mon May 05 20:06:43 2008 +0200
+++ b/dwm.c Mon May 05 20:26:51 2008 +0200
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
const char *symbol;
void (*arrange)(void
> Yes, of course. And this has to be discussed (with a certain "framework"
> of course - you can't come along and expect someone to integrate cairo
> or so). And this is why we have to make clear what exactly sucks less.
> I mean the term itself suggest that we're not developing software on a
>
"Szabolcs Nagy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/5/08, Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Let's do a poll!
>
> you meant technical discussion
>
> this is not fashion or politics
You don't do polls in fashion - normally it's unconsciously communicated
dictatorship.
Well and in
hiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is this stupid idea called democracy (just in case you heard of
> > it) and I tried to establish just a tiny fraction of it here in the dwm
> > development process. Shame on me!
>
> At the beginning dwm was Anselm's baby, and he said it shall only fit
>
On 5/5/08, Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's do a poll!
you meant technical discussion
this is not fashion or politics
> There is this stupid idea called democracy (just in case you heard of
> it) and I tried to establish just a tiny fraction of it here in the dwm
> development process. Shame on me!
At the beginning dwm was Anselm's baby, and he said it shall only fit
his needs. He made this very clear and I fu
hiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Polls are stupid.
There is this stupid idea called democracy (just in case you heard of
it) and I tried to establish just a tiny fraction of it here in the dwm
development process. Shame on me!
> All these recently added features seemed to me as if they are rath
Polls are stupid.
All these recently added features seemed to me as if they are rather a
matter of popularity, not sanity.
Dwm got off course and needs some clear objectives again!
"Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 10:35:22PM -0400, John Li wrote:
> > I'm not sure if this qualifies as a bug, but I think it's
> > unexpected/non-optimal behavior.
> >
> > Example setup:
> > Laptop screen at 1024x768 with a separate LCD at 1280x1024 position
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 12:08:06PM +0200, yy wrote:
> I don't have a dualhead setup to test, but in case you cannot move the
> mouse pointer out of the monitor borders you have a very easy
> solution: wrap the mouse to the nearest window corner at the begining
> of movemouse() (I wrote a patch for
I don't have a dualhead setup to test, but in case you cannot move the
mouse pointer out of the monitor borders you have a very easy
solution: wrap the mouse to the nearest window corner at the begining
of movemouse() (I wrote a patch for this once), then you will always
align your windows with the
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 10:35:22PM -0400, John Li wrote:
> I'm not sure if this qualifies as a bug, but I think it's
> unexpected/non-optimal behavior.
>
> Example setup:
> Laptop screen at 1024x768 with a separate LCD at 1280x1024 positioned on
> the left of the laptop. Here's a geom for that:
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
