> Seems I'm one of the few that prefers the no-border option.
Bah, not sure on the ... "few" ... "that prefers."
> if it does change, please do leave it optional.
Optional please, yes.
/Roy Lanek (West Sumatra)
--
,,
I also like the no-border behavior from a clarity point of view. My
situation is similar to Julio's in that I also use a very bright color
for the focused border and a very dark gray for the unfocused border.
This makes it quick and easy to see when a client has focus. When
there is only one client
I find your current discussion very relevant to what I'm doing with
dio[1] now. It would really be great to share ideas and, eventually,
join efforts.
I will try to explain the different ideas I had with dio development,
it's a long history.
This is what I have now:
The main idea behind dio was a
Hi all,
I think it could be useful to incorporate the following to dwm, in
order to achieve more customized rule conditions and actions in the
cases it's needed without compromising the rest.
typedef void (RuleAction)(Client *c, XClassHint* ch);
typedef struct {
.
RuleAction *action;
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:05:36PM -0700, Jack Woehr wrote:
> Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
>> What I really like about it is that rendered documents (which used to
>> be PostScript or PDF) are now the same as ordinary applications except
>> that applications handle input and may modify their windo
Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
What I really like about it is that rendered documents (which used to
be PostScript or PDF) are now the same as ordinary applications except
that applications handle input and may modify their window contents.
NeWS sort of worked that way, except its virtual mach
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:41:04AM -0800, David E. Thiel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:34:48PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> > And then define a key binding for it.
> >
> > Opinions?
>
> Seems I'm one of the few that prefers the no-border option. If there
> aren't any other clients on the
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:56:43AM -0700, Jack Woehr wrote:
> Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
>> I would really like to throw away X11. So that you have a universal
>> hardware-implementable rendering language and system (buffer management
>> etc.) and an event layer on top of it. So if you want to b
A patch to remove adjustborder is attached.
2009/2/19, David E. Thiel :
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:34:48PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> > And then define a key binding for it.
> >
> > Opinions?
>
>
> Seems I'm one of the few that prefers the no-border option. If there
> aren't any other cl
Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
I would really like to throw away X11. So that you have a universal
hardware-implementable rendering language and system (buffer management
etc.) and an event layer on top of it. So if you want to browse a
hyperlinked document you compile it to the rendering language
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 02:19:24PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/2/19 Matthias-Christian Ott :
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:07:16AM +0100, hiro wrote:
> >> > I think the only way is dropping HTML and CSS altogether and going
> >> > with something new. I'd be very interested in contributing.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:34:48PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> And then define a key binding for it.
>
> Opinions?
Seems I'm one of the few that prefers the no-border option. If there
aren't any other clients on the screen, I don't see a need to indicate
focus. And it looks quite nicely minima
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:53:41 +0100
Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Anselm R Garbe dixit (2009-02-19, 13:34):
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I dislike the recent addition of the 0 border if only 1 tiled client
> > is in the view, reasons:
> >
> > - gained screen real eastate is very minimal
> > - configure events
I agree too. The shimmy going from a one-client tag to a multi-client tag
and back again is very distracting.
Jeremy
On Thu 19 Feb 2009 - 02:57PM, Premysl Hruby wrote:
> On (19/02/09 13:34), Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> > To: dwm mail list
> > From: Anselm R Garbe
> > Subject: [dwm] Issues with bor
2009/2/19 Matthias-Christian Ott :
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:07:16AM +0100, hiro wrote:
>> > I think the only way is dropping HTML and CSS altogether and going
>> > with something new. I'd be very interested in contributing. I think
>> > the replacement should not only focus on presentation but
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 08:51:52AM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 2/18/09, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> > minimalism. What annoyed me then and now was CSS and its implementations
> > in modern browsers.
>
> css cannot be implemented (..in a suckless way)
>
> > there seems to be no agreed st
Good day.
Anselm R Garbe schrieb:
2009/2/18 Matthias-Christian Ott :
Any ideas?
I think the only way is dropping HTML and CSS altogether and going
with something new. I'd be very interested in contributing. I think
the replacement should not only focus on presentation but equally on
forming
Delta wrote:
Hi list,
Hey.
Does someone know an easy way to make slock print a message (like "I am on a meeting" or "I'll be back at 17:00") over its black screen?
I think nobody talk about this in the list and it seems to me that it would be a good functionality.
Well, I did exactly this 2
On (19/02/09 13:34), Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> To: dwm mail list
> From: Anselm R Garbe
> Subject: [dwm] Issues with border
> Reply-To: dwm mail list
> List-Id: dwm mail list
>
> Hi,
>
> I dislike the recent addition of the 0 border if only 1 tiled client
> is in the view, reasons:
>
> - gaine
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:07:16AM +0100, hiro wrote:
> > I think the only way is dropping HTML and CSS altogether and going
> > with something new. I'd be very interested in contributing. I think
> > the replacement should not only focus on presentation but equally on
> > forming a base for less s
Anselm R Garbe dixit (2009-02-19, 13:34):
> Hi,
>
> I dislike the recent addition of the 0 border if only 1 tiled client
> is in the view, reasons:
>
> - gained screen real eastate is very minimal
> - configure events are increased by n at any view() and toggleview(),
> if n is the number of cli
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 04:59:06PM -0600, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> In my estimation, the web is a lost cause. As time goes on, it's more
> and more a tool that is abused by idiots cramming too much broken
> "functionality" in them, and most browsers are just platforms from
> which to launch bad ideas
fullack.
2009/2/19, Anselm R Garbe :
> Hi,
>
> I dislike the recent addition of the 0 border if only 1 tiled client
> is in the view, reasons:
>
> - gained screen real eastate is very minimal
> - configure events are increased by n at any view() and toggleview(),
> if n is the number of clien
Hi,
I dislike the recent addition of the 0 border if only 1 tiled client
is in the view, reasons:
- gained screen real eastate is very minimal
- configure events are increased by n at any view() and toggleview(),
if n is the number of clients in the view
- corner cases for togglefloating()
- I di
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:31:47PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/2/18 Matthias-Christian Ott :
> > since several years I have been planed to launch a personal website. I
> > used to do quite aesthetical web design before I have subscribed to
> > minimalism. What annoyed me then and now was CS
Antoni Grzymala dixit (2009-02-19, 14:14):
> Delta dixit (2009-02-19, 14:09):
>
> > Does someone know an easy way to make slock print a message (like "I
> > am on a meeting" or "I'll be back at 17:00") over its black screen? I
> > think nobody talk about this in the list and it seems to me that
Delta dixit (2009-02-19, 14:09):
> Does someone know an easy way to make slock print a message (like "I
> am on a meeting" or "I'll be back at 17:00") over its black screen? I
> think nobody talk about this in the list and it seems to me that it
> would be a good functionality.
AFAIK, there's a
Hi list,
Does someone know an easy way to make slock print a message (like "I am on a
meeting" or "I'll be back at 17:00") over its black screen?
I think nobody talk about this in the list and it seems to me that it would be
a good functionality.
Regards,
Delta
2009/2/19 Joerg van den Hoff :
> hi there,
>
> some days ago I've started to receive mails
> like the attached one (about 3 up to now).
>
> so I have a few questions:
>
> -- does anybody else see this?
> -- what exactly does the message mean ("list of bounced messages: 7257")?
> -- is this a proble
hi there,
some days ago I've started to receive mails
like the attached one (about 3 up to now).
so I have a few questions:
-- does anybody else see this?
-- what exactly does the message mean ("list of bounced messages: 7257")?
-- is this a problem upstream on the mailing list machine or
a l
[2009-02-19 08:51] Szabolcs Nagy
>
> don't try to fix the browser, you can't
> it leads to a chaos where each website has different versions for each
> browser, display media, resolution,..
>
> there is no way to do "nice in all browsers" page (or pixel correct
> presentation)
I agree here. If
[2009-02-18 22:31] Anselm R Garbe
> 2009/2/18 Matthias-Christian Ott :
>
> I think the only way is dropping HTML and CSS altogether and going
> with something new.
It's still good enough ... so it is likely to stay for many more
years. :-(
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
32 matches
Mail list logo
