Re: [dwm] dwm's future

cairo or pango dependencies if he wants. Why not implement this ? -- Kind regards Guillaume Quintin

Re: [dwm] dual-head and floats on all tags (and one feature request)

ou can do the patch on your own, I'll be interested in it. If I have time tomorrow I will give it a try unless someone gives it before. -- Kind regards Guillaume Quintin --- dwm.c.orig 2009-04-18 13:49:24.0 +0200 +++ dwm.c 2009-04-20 00:49:20.971772171 +0200 @@ -12

[dwm] Re: Quick patch for multihead

that store informations about other monitors (than the one on which is the mouse) and a little function that moves the selected client to the screen number arg->i. This one is working and is very useful for me. -- Kind regards Guillaume Quintin --- dwm.old.c 2009-02-08 13:10:49.0 +0

Re: [dwm] C-version of dwm status (no xsetroot needed)

me temporary data somewhere between invocations. Anselm, if you don't like popen, then take Jeremy's runScript function. Neale Pickett, where are you in your investigations ? Could be X the problem ? -- Kind regards, Guillaume Quintin.

Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 14:52:55 -0800 Donald Chai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Guillaume Quintin wrote: > > > Why don't we change the way dwm gets its status text ? For example > > we could use the SIGALRM signal to call a "spa

Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 19:38:16 +0100 Guillaume Quintin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 19:20:58 +0100 > Guillaume Quintin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 09:26:25 -0700 > > Neale Pickett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 14:40:47 -0400 "Brendan MacDonell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Guillaume Quintin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just tried the close(0) patch but it does not change anything. > > And I found some

Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 19:20:58 +0100 Guillaume Quintin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 09:26:25 -0700 > Neale Pickett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Jeremy Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > This was my hunch too, glad so

Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

m */ read status from p[0]; display status; } This will take only a few LOC, because all the reading p[0] part will be in fact the reading-stdin code from the run() function which will not be needed anymore. This has the advantages that one can change the status when dwm is runni

Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:52:26 +0100 yy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/12/5 Guillaume Quintin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:33:44 + > > > > Here is my .xinitrc : > > > > while true > > do > >echo `date` > &

Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

> $XSTATUS & > > STATUS_PID=$! > > dwm < $XSTATUS > > kill $STATUS_PID > > rm $XSTATUS > > I also think this is rather related to the status feed. > > Kind regards, > --Anselm > Here is my .xinitrc : while true do echo `date` sleep 1 done | dwm This is exactly the same .xinitrc I used with dwm-5.2, and it worked fine with dwm-5.2. -- Kind regards, Guillaume Quintin.

Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

ual this is the dwmii patch for dwm-5.3. I think I have an issue when quitting dwm : If windows are openned (xterm, claws-mail, firefox, pidgin for example) then X won't shut down until I close (when possible) the windows. Does this have to do with the new "simple-fork" ? I did not havs