Works perfectly well. Thanks again
Thierry
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Jeremy Jay wrote:
> not incredibly difficult to modify the existing tile() function for
> this this isnt the most up-to-date version of dwm, but plop
> something similar to this into your config.h
>
> --
Thanks Jeremy,
I will give it a try.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Jeremy Jay wrote:
> not incredibly difficult to modify the existing tile() function for
> this this isnt the most up-to-date version of dwm, but plop
> something similar to this into your config.h
>
> ---
not incredibly difficult to modify the existing tile() function for
this this isnt the most up-to-date version of dwm, but plop
something similar to this into your config.h
---
static void
htile(void) {
int y, h;
unsigned int i, n;
Client *c;
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:19:05PM -0500, thierry beauquier wrote:
> Do you remenber when it was and if it was the same patch's name?? This would
> help my googling :-)
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:04 PM, James Turner wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:01:03PM -0500, thierry beauquier wrote
Do you remenber when it was and if it was the same patch's name?? This would
help my googling :-)
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:04 PM, James Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:01:03PM -0500, thierry beauquier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a patch to have pure horizontal tiling?
> >
> > Mean
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:01:03PM -0500, thierry beauquier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a patch to have pure horizontal tiling?
>
> Meaning:
>
> +--+
> ||
> +--+
> ||
> +
Hi,
Is there a patch to have pure horizontal tiling?
Meaning:
+--+
||
+--+
||
+--+
||
+--+
Regards
Thierry
On Sun,
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 10:25:41AM -0500, David Neu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just about to download the bottom stack patch for dwm-5.4.1 from,
>
> http://www.suckless.org/dwm/patches/bottom_stack.html
>
> but noticed it's dated 20081217. Is this correct?
>
> Many thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> David
He
Hi,
I was just about to download the bottom stack patch for dwm-5.4.1 from,
http://www.suckless.org/dwm/patches/bottom_stack.html
but noticed it's dated 20081217. Is this correct?
Many thanks!
Cheers,
David
Thanks to James Turner for keeping the bstack patch alive! I've updated
the wiki with the 4.4 patch (only tweaked one or two lines):
http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm/patches/bottom_stack
Thanks! -Ross
On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 13:16 -0400, James Turner wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 12:45:47PM -0
Anselm R. Garbe --> dwm (2007-05-24 16:27:44 +0200):
> I pushed a slightly different version, which seemed more obvious
> to me:
[...]
Sure, that's cleaner. Works fine, thanks!
Regards, Jukka
--
bashian roulette:
$ ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -rf ~
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 04:10:20PM +0200, Jukka Salmi wrote:
> Anselm R. Garbe --> dwm (2007-05-24 15:44:33 +0200):
> > Ok I pushed a version, which handles the problem properly for
> > both master and stack areas. It's time for you guys to test this
> > now!
>
> Seems to work fine, thanks! Except
Anselm R. Garbe --> dwm (2007-05-24 15:44:33 +0200):
> Ok I pushed a version, which handles the problem properly for
> both master and stack areas. It's time for you guys to test this
> now!
Seems to work fine, thanks! Except for the case if nmaster > n; in
that case the calculate height of the la
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:01:19AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:42:46PM -0400, Ross Mohn wrote:
> > I've posted a new patch that works, but I don't think that the vanilla
> > dwm code deals with all the cases that might need the remainder
> > solution. For example, if
That's indeed an issue. So the question is, wether we revert the
algorithm to not handling any remainder or to handle it properly
for both, master and stack windows.
doesn't it only affects the layout code?
i consider layouts as plugins/extensions so not a core dwm feature
that one can replace
Anselm R. Garbe --> dwm (2007-05-24 11:01:19 +0200):
> Hi Ross,
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:42:46PM -0400, Ross Mohn wrote:
> > I've posted a new patch that works, but I don't think that the vanilla
> > dwm code deals with all the cases that might need the remainder
> > solution. For example, i
Hi Ross,
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:42:46PM -0400, Ross Mohn wrote:
> I've posted a new patch that works, but I don't think that the vanilla
> dwm code deals with all the cases that might need the remainder
> solution. For example, if nmaster>1, you might want to apply a remainder
> to the bottom
I've posted a new patch that works, but I don't think that the vanilla
dwm code deals with all the cases that might need the remainder
solution. For example, if nmaster>1, you might want to apply a remainder
to the bottom window, but it would be different from the tiling
remainder. How correct are
Philipp Köhler --> dwm (2007-05-22 12:58:32 +0200):
> i dont know if this is dwm's fault or the stacked mode...
> but in landscapemode the second windows isnt visible,,,
Seems to be a bug in the bstack patch. Try applying the attached patch
after applying the bstack patch.
HTH, Jukka
--
bashia
i dont know if this is dwm's fault or the stacked mode...
but in landscapemode the second windows isnt visible,,,
thx a lot anyways!
On 5/22/07, Philipp Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i dont know if this is dwm's fault or the stacked mode...
but in landscapemode the second windows isnt visib
i dont know if this is dwm's fault or the stacked mode...
but in landscapemode the second windows isnt visible,,,
thx a lot anyways!
On 5/22/07, Ross Mohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Bottom Stack patch for dwm-4.1 is now available.
http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm/patches/bottom_stack/
The Bottom Stack patch for dwm-4.1 is now available.
http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm/patches/bottom_stack/
Enjoy! -RPM
I released a new version of the patch today -- dwm-3.8-bstack.1.diff --
it renames 'tileright' back to the default name of 'tile'. So now here
are all the possibilities:
#define LAYOUTS \
static Layout layout[] = { \
/* symbol function */
{ "[]=",tile }, /* first entry is default */
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 12:38:22PM -0400, Ross Mohn wrote:
> The Bottom Stack patch for dwm-3.8 is now available.
Cool!
Before anybody asks: It won't be before this weekend that I can start
to look into the bottom stack patch to release an update of dwm-mitch.
Regards,
Christian
--
Christi
The Bottom Stack patch for dwm-3.8 is now available. I want to thank
Anselm for the new, super clean code base on which layout patches can
now be applied!
This patch provides additional layouts for dwm. It no longer includes
code for client title bars as that is truly separate functionality. I
hop
The Bottom Stack patch for dwm-3.5 is now available (built in between
looking after my son and his friends on a snowy Vermont day off from
school & work!).
http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm/patches/bottom_stack/
Enjoy! -RPM
There's a new release of this patch posted now (dwm-3.4-bstack-2.diff)
so that it compiles without #define TITLES. Thanks to both Olli
Rohbani-Baacke and Martin Sander for pointing out this error!
-RPM
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 10:54 -0500, Ross Mohn wrote:
> The Bottom Stack patch for dwm-3.4 is now
The Bottom Stack patch for dwm-3.4 is now available. It took a little
longer because of an unexpected change to the focus() code. Remember
that you can add client title bars back in by #define TITLES in the
config.h file!
http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm/patches/bottom_stack/
Enjoy! -RPM
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 12:12 +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 09:39:51AM +0100, Anthony Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 11:02:56PM -0500, Ross Mohn wrote:
> > > An "rc1" version of the Bottom Stack patch for dwm-3.1 is now available.
> > > It seems to work for me, but
here is my dwm 3.1 patch (it's not just bottom stack patch though)
added:
+ 3 tiled mode: right stack and bottom stack with horiz./vert. split
+ tile mode can be changed per tag
+ xrandr screen resize handler
+ togglemax
removed:
- toggleview (only one view at a time)
- nmaster
- client stack
n
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 09:39:51AM +0100, Anthony Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 11:02:56PM -0500, Ross Mohn wrote:
> > An "rc1" version of the Bottom Stack patch for dwm-3.1 is now available.
> > It seems to work for me, but please test and let me know of any
> > problems! It should suppor
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 09:39 +0100, Anthony Brown wrote:
> Thanks for this patch, I'm definitely using the "#define TITLES" option.
> Everything seems to be working fine so far, the only thing I've noticed
> is that the coloured border around the focused window seems to follow
> the focus only if th
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 11:02:56PM -0500, Ross Mohn wrote:
> An "rc1" version of the Bottom Stack patch for dwm-3.1 is now available.
> It seems to work for me, but please test and let me know of any
> problems! It should support the nmaster feature in all the layout modes.
>
> I did include a com
An "rc1" version of the Bottom Stack patch for dwm-3.1 is now available.
It seems to work for me, but please test and let me know of any
problems! It should support the nmaster feature in all the layout modes.
I did include a compile-time option in config.h to put back the client
titles on unfocus
The Bottom Stack patch for dwm-3.0 is now available. Maybe if I had a
sweet wide-aspect monitor like Anselm I wouldn't need it, but as for
now, I like the "[]=" layout best for coding and the "TTT" layout best
for most everything else.
http://dwm.suckless.org/view.sh/bottom+stack+layout
For the d
The Bottom Stack patch for dwm-2.8 is now available. There are many
changes from 2.7 and all previous patches, so please read the notes on
the website! You will need to make changes to your config.h file! The
biggest functional changes are the ability to toggle portrait/landscape
tiling orientation
The Bottom Stack Patch for dwm-2.5.1 is now available in taggi.
http://dwm.suckless.org/view.sh/bottom+stack+layout
Enjoy! -RPM
Ross Mohn wrote:
>
> The Bottom Stack Patch for dwm-2.4 is now available in taggi.
Excellent stuff. Thanks.
> I've
> removed my convenience binding of viewall() to mouse Button2; the lower
> right corner tag label dots make the viewall() function unnecessary for
> me now.
I still use viewall()
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 09:09:25AM -0500, Ross Mohn wrote:
> The Bottom Stack Patch for dwm-2.4 is now available in taggi. I've
> removed my convenience binding of viewall() to mouse Button2; the lower
> right corner tag label dots make the viewall() function unnecessary for
> me now. I also used a
The Bottom Stack Patch for dwm-2.4 is now available in taggi. I've
removed my convenience binding of viewall() to mouse Button2; the lower
right corner tag label dots make the viewall() function unnecessary for
me now. I also used a few more ternary expressions in order to reduce
the number of chan
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 16:31 +1300, Karl. wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 10:00:40PM -0500, Ross Mohn wrote:
> > The Bottom Stack Patch for dwm-2.3 is now available in taggi.
>
> Yay! :-)
:-)
> Now I just need to figure out how best to apply it. I presume that the
> basic approach is to use th
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 10:00:40PM -0500, Ross Mohn wrote:
> The Bottom Stack Patch for dwm-2.3 is now available in taggi.
Yay! :-)
Now I just need to figure out how best to apply it. I presume that the
basic approach is to use the 'hg import' option, and I guess that that
merges the patch di
The Bottom Stack Patch for dwm-2.3 is now available in taggi.
http://dwm.suckless.org/view.sh/bottom+stack+layout
Cheers! -RPM
Ross Mohn a écrit :
The Bottom Stack Patch (formerly known as the Wide Layout Patch) for
dwm-2.1 is now available in taggi.
http://dwm.suckless.org/view.sh/bottom+stack+layout
Cheers! -RPM
Thank you very much Ross !
--
Philippe-Pierre
The Bottom Stack Patch (formerly known as the Wide Layout Patch) for
dwm-2.1 is now available in taggi.
http://dwm.suckless.org/view.sh/bottom+stack+layout
Cheers! -RPM
45 matches
Mail list logo
