On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:40:09AM +0200, yy wrote:
> 2008/4/9, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:52:03PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> > > yy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, this is my proposal in patch form. I'm not sure about the
> > > >
2008/4/9, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:52:03PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> > yy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Well, this is my proposal in patch form. I'm not sure about the
> > > convenience of setting fx and fy in tileresize, but you get the
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:16:03PM +0200, yy wrote:
> Well, this is my proposal in patch form. I'm not sure about the
> convenience of setting fx and fy in tileresize, but you get the idea.
I think about your solution.
Kind regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D7
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:52:03PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> yy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, this is my proposal in patch form. I'm not sure about the
> > convenience of setting fx and fy in tileresize, but you get the idea.
>
> I posted a similar patch on 31st March, so it
yy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, this is my proposal in patch form. I'm not sure about the
> convenience of setting fx and fy in tileresize, but you get the idea.
I posted a similar patch on 31st March, so it is wasted effort.
Regards
Matthias-Christian
Well, this is my proposal in patch form. I'm not sure about the
convenience of setting fx and fy in tileresize, but you get the idea.
--
- yiyus || JGL .
diff -r 595ed1a4447c dwm.c
--- a/dwm.c Tue Apr 08 11:49:35 2008 +0100
+++ b/dwm.c Tue Apr 08 18:59:12 2008 +0200
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ struct Cl
yy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/4/8, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 01:35:40PM +0200, yy wrote:
> > > 2008/4/8, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > Any complains?
> > > >
> > >
> > > If we are coming back to reverse geometries per client, what's the
2008/4/8, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 01:35:40PM +0200, yy wrote:
> > 2008/4/8, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Any complains?
> > >
> >
> > If we are coming back to reverse geometries per client, what's the
> > point of resizing clients in focus change
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 01:35:40PM +0200, yy wrote:
> 2008/4/8, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:55:29PM +0200, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
> > > as `togglemax' seems gone in 4.9: I agree, that `monocle'
> > > is very useful (and superior). the only problem is (
2008/4/8, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:55:29PM +0200, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
> > as `togglemax' seems gone in 4.9: I agree, that `monocle'
> > is very useful (and superior). the only problem is (seems?)
> > that one cannot easily toggle back and forth to
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 10:50:56AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:55:29PM +0200, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
> > as `togglemax' seems gone in 4.9: I agree, that `monocle'
> > is very useful (and superior). the only problem is (seems?)
> > that one cannot easily toggle
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:55:29PM +0200, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
> as `togglemax' seems gone in 4.9: I agree, that `monocle'
> is very useful (and superior). the only problem is (seems?)
> that one cannot easily toggle back and forth to the previous
> layout. rather, one needs to cycle thro
On Mon 07-04-2008 13:55 +0200, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
> question: any chance of making `dwm' remember any `floating'
> positioning information on a per-window basis which would enable
> restoration of positions when coming back to floating layout?
Hi, I'd also like to see such a functionality
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 02:07:04PM +0200, Julien Barnier wrote:
> Hi Joerg,
>
> > question: is their a chance to get a kind of `togglemonocle'
> > functionality into dwm without writing it myself? this would
> > seem a frequent demand: activate monocle for some time than
> > switch back to tiling
Hi Joerg,
> question: is their a chance to get a kind of `togglemonocle'
> functionality into dwm without writing it myself? this would
> seem a frequent demand: activate monocle for some time than
> switch back to tiling (or whatever layout was in effect
> previously).
I had a similar dema
hi,
as `togglemax' seems gone in 4.9: I agree, that `monocle'
is very useful (and superior). the only problem is (seems?)
that one cannot easily toggle back and forth to the previous
layout. rather, one needs to cycle through all 4 layouts
right now, it seems. this is not so nice...
quest
16 matches
Mail list logo
