One would think that submitting your QSL's through a field checker
would give a faster turn-around. Can anyone verify this by personal
experience?
Dave Miller W1GDQ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
**It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money &
Financ
]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 8:08 AM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
One would think that submitting your QSL's through a field checker
would give a faster turn-around. Can anyone verify this by personal
experience?
Dave Miller W1GDQ
[EMAIL PROT
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 9:08 AM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
One would think that submitting your QSL's through a field checker
would give a faster turn-around. Can anyone ver
I dunno. It still goes into the queue at HQ and the QSO's have to be
entered into their computer by someone. Probably not a lot of time
difference.
73, Zack W9SZ
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One would think that submitting your QSL's through a field checker
would give a f
Best advantage is you will not lose your cards in the mail and you save the
postage fees.
Bill W4WX
- Original Message -
From: wmills
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 12:02 PM
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
There is little
Only in terms of saving in mailing the cards and getting
them back. Once the app is processed by the field
checker, it still goes thri the process First in first out
So even if the chceker mails them in the next day, if the
process time is 6 weeks.
Steve KF2TI
NNJ DXCC Field Checker
On
) or LOTW submitsÂ….they all get processed in order received.
Don
Ac7zg
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 8:08 AM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
One would think that submitting your QSL&
David:
You would think so. Given the large backlog lately, I made a "very friendly"
suggestion to Bill Moore that they sort the submittals into 2 piles (Field
Checked and Physical Cards), and have the bulk of their effort directed at
Physical Card submittals. My belief was that the time require
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: DX Chat
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
Don:
That is not quite true. My last submittal was what they call a "Hybrid"
submittal consisting of a few LOTW credits added to the main part of the
sub
The fastest way of all is to bring them to the ARRL HQ. in person & wait while
the cards are checked ( if I remember right there is an extra small fee ). Once
a year I call the day before so they expect me then do a LoTW submission & fill
in the # of paper cards I'll be bringing. Then the applic
Some of the grumbling has apparently worked its way upstream. I understand that
a couple of more employees have now been assigned to checking cards at HQ. It
will still take them a long time to work their way out of the hole. I made the
LOTW portion of a dual application on March 6th. Without the a
One aspect of the problem hasn't been discussed before that I know of. A lot of
the aps are people who were at the "Top of the Honor Roll" who are simply
submitting an ap to cover a new entity that came along (FJ, etc.) and they want
to get "back on top". These aps are 1 or 2 cards at the most.
bmitted (with card checking) or LOTW submits..they all get
processed in order received.
Don
Ac7zg
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 8:08 AM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
ssion
with LOTW
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 9:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: DX Chat
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
Don:
That is not quite true. My last submittal was what they c
is with the lack of adequate staffing to handle
the backlog.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: DX Chat
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
David:
You would think so.
ehalf Of Don
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 10:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'DX Chat'
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
Please reread carefully
All I said is that the queue date is from LOTW submission, not the date from
field checking.
My example - I submitted 11/29/2007
n Behalf Of Don
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'DX Chat'
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
And your submittal date should be the LOTW submission date, not the date the
application was received from the field, checker..this is what I have
already
__
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 12:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'DX Chat'
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
So you suggest those that get field checked go to the head of the line?
And
on the COO's plan
each year. Nothing yet.
73, Wayne, N7NG
Jackson Hole, Wyoming
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 12:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAI
now to paper
loggings - except someone does not have to type it in at HQ.
_
From: wmills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'DX Chat'
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
ECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'DX Chat'
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 2:02 PM
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
Wayne
That makes good sense - saves someone at HQ entering text for all the cards.
And for those submitting cards-only for HQ, why not allow them t
21 matches
Mail list logo
