RFg0V0lOIHdhcyB2ZXJ5IGhlbHBmdWwgZm9yIHRoaXMgYXV0dW1uIERYQ0Mgc3VibWlzc2lvbiBm
b3IgbWUuDQpOb3cgSSBzdWdnZXN0IG9uZSB0aGluZyB0byBiZSBpbXByb3ZlZC4NCkFSUkwgRFhD
QyBkZXNrIGFzayBzb3J0aW5nIG9yZGVyIGlzIFNTQi1DVy1SVFRZLiBIb3dldmVyIERYNFdJTiBz
b3J0IG9yZGVyIGlzIENXLVJUVFktU1NCLg0KSSBob3BlIHRoZSBuZXh0IHZlcnNpb24g
I don't think the order matters as long as the modes are grouped together by
band, since the form indicates "e.g." (for example). Besides the possible
date problem also noted, with an "m" in the "band" column, I have band sorted
alphabetically (15m, 160m, 17m) not numerically. (I exported to a
Good suggestion-it probably would be a good idea to use the ARRL form as
an exact model. In that vein, I would also suggest modifying the date
format of the DX4WIN submission sheet for DXCC as follows:
Current DX4WIN date format: 25 Sep 2002
Format used on ARRL form:25/09/02
Also, while on
3 matches
Mail list logo