On Jan 7, 2008 9:01 PM, Robert Naumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yep. And here come the supporters of those who cause their own problems and
> blame it on the software.
>
> Why is it that some users don't have problems? Perhaps they are not causing
> them? Why is it that users who cause proble
they are making a mistake?
73,
Bob W5OV
-Original Message-
From: n4dsp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 9:41 AM
To: Mike Mellinger WA0SXV; dx4win
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Unhappy with DX4WIN
This reminds me of the FT2000 and Mark V reflector. Person has
a proble
net
Subject: RE: [Dx4win] Unhappy with DX4WIN
Hard to believe that you are me lecturing on software design and operation.
Let's just say I have a bit of experience -- about 4 decades in software
design, implementation and support including primary design responsibility
for online library systems
n
excellent customer base, I doubt they'd be willing to invest such
time and money on a very limited return on investment.
Mark K3MSB
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 7 20:54:35 2008
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Louis Dietrich)
Date: Mon Jan 7 20:54:47 2008
Subject: [Dx4win] Unhappy with DX
It does seem that a LOT of the problems discussed here recently have been,
at the very least, partially, if not completely, due to the fact that the
complainant did NOT back up his/her data BEFORE trying the changes they did!
Which makes ANY complaint about the software per se somewhat academic, I
he web:
http://dx4win.ad1c.us/awards.htm
73 - Jim AD1C
--
Jim Reisert AD1C/?, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.ad1c.us
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 7 14:59:40 2008
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Lunday, WD4ELG)
Date: Mon Jan 7 15:00:33 2008
Subject: [Dx4win] Unhappy with DX4WIN
In-Repl
-
Jim Reisert AD1C/?, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.ad1c.us
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 7 14:15:17 2008
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Victor West)
Date: Mon Jan 7 14:18:10 2008
Subject: [Dx4win] Unhappy with DX4WIN
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This reminds me of the FT2000 and Mark V reflector. Person has
a problem and posts to the reflector and here come the dxwin crusade
of defenders stating they did not have a problem. So what! You do not
have a problem. Mike does.
So where is the tech support from Paul? That is what the issue really
n't have happened at all.
As for all of you saying how happy you are: that doesn't change the facts. I
was happy too until I got bagged by the defects.
73,
Mike WA0SXV
-Original Message-
From: Robert Naumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 20:41
To: &#x
ECTED]
On Behalf Of Robert Naumann
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 17:25
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Dx4win] Unhappy with DX4WIN
Mike,
It sounds like you may have a file corruption problem.
I have never seen any of the errors you are reporting in well over 10 years
of using DX4win -
ginal Message-
From: Mike Mellinger WA0SXV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 5:46 PM
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Dx4win] Unhappy with DX4WIN
You gloss over something there. You always have to check the DXCC total
after doing anything with the country file.
TECTED]
On Behalf Of Tom Branch
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 16:33
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Dx4win] Unhappy with DX4WIN
Mike,
I've been a user since 0.93B--pretty much since the beginning. I don't know
why you're having problems with country files. I simply replac
I have been a user for at least 8 years. But I may not be much longer.
I tried to add FJ. Interesting results including index out of range error.
Had to restart DX4WIN.
But it added FJ.
So I tried adding TO5FJ. Index out of range error. QSO added. Had to
restart DX4WIN. Deleted QSO.
Now
13 matches
Mail list logo
