.
Gerard
2015-02-18 20:29 GMT+01:00 Bill Williams b...@cs.wisc.edu:
On 02/18/2015 01:00 PM, Gerard wrote:
I'm not sure at which point it hangs, but I have set up an example that
I think mimics what happens with my application. In this example the
mutatee hangs after creating 32294 threads. I'm
Then let's hope that debug logs will tell us where is the problem!
I'm using Gentoo Linux with kernel 3.18.3-gentoo.
Gerard
2015-02-18 20:42 GMT+01:00 Bill Williams b...@cs.wisc.edu:
On 02/18/2015 01:37 PM, Gerard wrote:
Ah ok, I didn't know that.
About how reproducible is the error, I
I wish I could help, but I don't know where to start. Thanks for your help.
I just have a question, is there any way to tell Dyninst to ignore the
newly created threads? (similarly as detaching after forking but even
sooner if it is possible).
Gerard
2015-02-18 21:17 GMT+01:00 Bill Williams b
with kernel version 3.18.3-gentoo.
Gerard
2015-02-06 21:54 GMT+01:00 Bill Williams b...@cs.wisc.edu:
As per discussion earlier this week, here's an initial implementation of
TLS-based trampguards. It is not yet pushed to master; I've tested it
locally but it has not been through serious cross
,
Gerard
2015-01-29 19:41 GMT+01:00 Matthew LeGendre legend...@llnl.gov:
I think using a callback that detaches on fork would remove that
first-time penalty.
Since Dyninst follows forks and execs by default, it's opening and parsing
the gcc executable when your application calls system
