To Major Bosco.. The tone of your message makes me believe that you did not read my post correctly.
I don't think I expressed an opinion on the validity of GoldMoney patents and law suit. On the contrary, I admit that their could be some contradictions. (See my post to Ken). What I said is that according to the law here in Canada, the situation is clear. A goldgram is not a claim or a demand note, it is a title on a undivided interest in a specific gold quantity. I am pretty sure that the law of the Bahamas and the law of the US and many other countries also recognized the "undivided property" as it is a very basic element in ownership law. As for the rest of your comments, I will let the court decide what is right. As I have said here on occasion, I prefer GoldMoney's model but I like both e-gold and GoldMoney and believe that both can co- exists or reach an agreement if ordered by the court. Claude Cormier Ormetal Inc. --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.
