[e-gold-list] RE: It appears the e-gold scammer is back

2002-06-03 Thread John Haynes
Actually the SSL certificate claims to have been generated by logo.com for logo.com. Since logo.com isn't a valid CA it doesn't mean anything. With a little know how you can roll your own SSL certs signed by yourself. I don't think there's anything that necessarily indicates that logo.com is

[e-gold-list] RE: It appears the e-gold scammer is back

2002-06-03 Thread RJ LeVeque
Yeah, I got one too... I guess I rate now. LMAO! 64.177.232.173 has dubious reverse DNS of logo.com - which is a valid hostname, but not one that resolves to 64.177.232.173 This is the email addy on the cert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Forget about wasting time trying to track this down. By the time