[e-gold-list] Re: Dirty Hammers

2002-01-15 Thread RJ LeVeque
> >> Very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, > >> very, very, very, very obviously, it should thus be trivial to state > >> 2 or 3 *enormous*, I mean *enormous*, examples of these > >> "HYIP"/whatever games. > >> > >> > >> CAN ANYONE DO SO? Yeah, I can... give me a

[e-gold-list] Re: Dirty Hammers

2002-01-15 Thread jpm
>> Very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, >> very, very, very, very obviously, it should thus be trivial to state >> 2 or 3 *enormous*, I mean *enormous*, examples of these >> "HYIP"/whatever games. >> >> >> CAN ANYONE DO SO? > >Have you seen: www.e-told.com? > >"Ge

[e-gold-list] Re: Dirty Hammers

2002-01-15 Thread SnowDog
> Very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, > very, very, very, very obviously, it should thus be trivial to state > 2 or 3 *enormous*, I mean *enormous*, examples of these > "HYIP"/whatever games. > > > CAN >ANYONE > DO >SO? Have you seen: www.e-told.com?

[e-gold-list] Re: Dirty Hammers

2002-01-15 Thread jpm
>To all and sundry: > >I think Jim D and I have wasted enough of your bandwidth with our pissing >match, but I'd just like to clarify one more thing: I didn't call anybody >here a wingnut. > On this whole issue, Julian, Jim, or any one else: I very simply am curious about the following. Please!

[e-gold-list] Re: Dirty Hammers

2002-01-15 Thread Julian Dibbell
To all and sundry: I think Jim D and I have wasted enough of your bandwidth with our pissing match, but I'd just like to clarify one more thing: I didn't call anybody here a wingnut. Through no one's fault but my own, Jim has misconstrued my Dirty Harry's Hammer fable. I should have spelled out