: -mark
: Personally, I would like to see a type of account access ACL installed
: on egold accounts, (something I've mentioned to the developers there
: already).
Mark, Pecunix has this!
Sidd.
PS Very soon now!
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscrib
On 21 Aug 2002, at 8:42, Mark Jeftovic wrote:
> Basically it would be like unix-style tcp wrappers but at the account
> login level, so you could specify netblocks that are allowed to log
> into your account to the exclusion of all others.
Indeed an excellent security feature that works very we
The fact that there was an open port (31337) shows that your
protection wasn't good.
It seems to show that a trojan was installed. The fact that
Anti-Trojan didn't find anything shows simply nothing, I can develop a
trojan that is not detected in a couple of hours (minutes ?
- Yes, but we don't have any satisfactory explanation about what really
happenned, do we ?
(nor do we have any satisfactory explanation as to why e-Bull suddenly
changed all passwords a few days ago)
- No, because thanks to e-Bull staff quick reaction, the funds were
recovered and put back into o
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, PHV wrote:
> Maybe some day the scammers and Hackers will understand that we have other
> means of protecting our assets and accounts, and that their attempts are
> pointless.
>
No offense intended but... didn't you just get ripped for $3K in
e-bullion?
Personally, I would
Of course, we have all kinds of anti virus virus and firewalls on our
systems, but for obvious reasons, I would rather not elaborate on what they
are...
We too are constatntly bombarded with virus infected emails and intrusion
attempts, but I guess it comes with the territory we are in...
Maybe