At 5:13 PM +0200 3/5/03, Arik Schenkler wrote:
...
>We won't. We allow everyone to use the system. We do not know who you are.
>As a matter of fact - we do not care who you are!!!
I'm amazed that the "HYIP" folks seem to disdain your currency, then,
when other currencies do various things to drive
Jim shalom,
> How would you (or the other anonymous currencies) keep
> criminals or terrorists from using your product if it's truly
> anonymous?
We won't. We allow everyone to use the system. We do not know who you are.
As a matter of fact - we do not care who you are!!!
How does the Federal Res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:23:56PM -0500, James M. Ray wrote:
> >Why is Lucre project so interesting?!
>
[cut]
> This brings up the point that I really want open-source software
> projects to accept e-gold donations, it's a good thing in a number of
>
Jim shalom,
> Anyway, to the extent that currency is cryptography (which it isn't,
> but ok) there's a theory that an attacker should be able to know
> the source and still not break the system as long as he does not
> have the key, so a bit of that may apply. IMO!
What do you mean - "know the so
At 11:16 PM +0200 3/4/03, Arik Schenkler wrote:
>Jim shalom,
>
Shalom, Arik. (I probably should have said "Arik's I$ is interesting and
always on-topic, too!) :) and ecoin.net's cool, too! And all the others!!"
Money Money Money!!!
>> The incredibly-interesting Lucrative project, for example, i
Jim shalom,
> The incredibly-interesting Lucrative project, for example, is on-topic
Why is Lucre project so interesting?!
What is the benefit of the inability of the issuer to know the code of the
currency?
What are the risks?
I was looking into Lucre and thought of using it. But, I do not see
