[e-gold-list] Re: Q for Jay

2003-04-12 Thread jrw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- hiya craig, i understand now! - if you try to login to the account and do not get the Turing number entry correct, it *does not* count as an invalid access. the date/time that is announced ;) when you login as "The last invalid login attempt" means a human (or

[e-gold-list] Re: Q for Jay

2003-04-12 Thread Craig Spencer
On 12 Apr 2003, at 14:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Concerning your announcement of illicit attempts to log into > > accounts ... Does an attempt to log in which fails the Turing > > test count? [I occaisionally fail the Turing test! :)] If so, it > > might be a good idea to differentiate

[e-gold-list] Re: Q for Jay

2003-04-12 Thread Randall Randall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [> craig wrote:] >>Concerning your announcement of illicit attempts to log into >>accounts ... Does an attempt to log in which fails the Turing >>test count? [I occaisionally fail the Turing test! :)] If so, > > i don't remember what announcement i made, but yeah, Turi

[e-gold-list] Re: Q for Jay

2003-04-12 Thread jrw
> Jay, > > Concerning your announcement of illicit attempts to log into > accounts ... Does an attempt to log in which fails the Turing > test count? [I occaisionally fail the Turing test! :)] If so, > it might be a good idea to differentiate between password falures > and Turing test failure