[e-gold-list] Re: What good is "backing"?

2001-06-26 Thread SnowDog
> The thing is, there are probably cheaper ways to get a physical bar of gold > in either Dubai or London, but since it can be done IMO someone's probably > someday going to do it (but it won't be me!). IMO, speaking only for myself, > etc... > JMR Well, the important thing is, is that if there

[e-gold-list] Re: What good is "backing"?

2001-06-26 Thread James M. Ray
At 03:30 PM -0700 06/26/2001, Vince Callaway wrote: ... >Just to be the Devils Advocate, what is E-Gold's redemption proceedure? > >Seems like they have left it up to the market makers to do that, same as >OSGold. > >From the site: >To take physical delivery of metal from your account, >you wil

[e-gold-list] Re: What good is "backing"?

2001-06-26 Thread Vince Callaway
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Viking Coder wrote: > Very true. Even if they claimed to match circulation 100% by hard > un-allocated metal, without a redemption policy they are not a gold backed > currency. Until OSGold implements a redemption procedure, they will be a > EGC "Ether Gold Currency". Just

[e-gold-list] Re: What good is "backing"?

2001-06-26 Thread Viking Coder
> > They have. They made a proud, high-faluting claim of being 150% backed. > > Then they described what they actually meant when they said 150% backed; > > 50% paper fiat cash, 50% paper gold certificates, 50% gold. Which means > > they aren't 100% backed by hard gold. > > More to the point: the