Danny shalom,
A very interesting story.
If the story is true then this raises the question of the reasons E_Gold
respected this court order.
Isn't E-Gold an offshore company thus US courts have no "power" over it?!
Schenkler - Chief Money Maker
Internet Dollar electronic money system - http://
>
> FWIW you can do exactly this:
>
> >Cheque type payments could be accepted (deposited), rejected or
> ignored by
> >the payee. Accepted payments would be cleared or bounce on
> deposit. Cheques
> >could be reserved against the payer's account balance, e.g. a 10 gram
> >secured cheque would redu
> a smart accounts based payment system would allow the account owner to
> control both incoming and outgoing payments.
Exactly.
I need control over incoming payments as well.
Requiring the payee to go to e-gold site inorder to claim (or refuse) a payment
would solve this problem.
> Accounts c
> At 02:03 PM 4/4/03 +0200, "Danny Van den Berghe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >Apparently my account was frozen by court order
> > >On Friday, March 21, 2003, Cash Cards was attempting to fund an E-Gold
> > account
> >for one of its customers, in the amount of $3,260.00, but Cash Cards
> >ina
Hi David,
FWIW you can do exactly this:
Cheque type payments could be accepted (deposited), rejected or ignored by
the payee. Accepted payments would be cleared or bounce on deposit. Cheques
could be reserved against the payer's account balance, e.g. a 10 gram
secured cheque would reduce the paye
a smart accounts based payment system would allow the account owner to
control both incoming and outgoing payments. The logic is as follows:
payments can be made by the payer authorising the payment then either
sending it to the payee as a cheque, or through the accounts system as a
transfer.
payee
> From: Danny Van den Berghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi all,
> I would like to report to you what has happened to me, because I think
> this is a
> precedent with dangerous implications for all of us.
>
[...]
>
> What is e-gold going to do about this?
> Clearly the system is not safe. Non
At 02:03 PM 4/4/03 +0200, "Danny Van den Berghe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apparently my account was frozen by court order
>On Friday, March 21, 2003, Cash Cards was attempting to fund an E-Gold
account
for one of its customers, in the amount of $3,260.00, but Cash Cards
inadvertently put the
> What is e-gold going to do about this?
> Clearly the system is not safe. Non-repudiable payment is now a joke, it
is
> simply rejected by the court.
> Somebody wants his money back, he can go to the Minesota court and say the
> payment was made by mistake:
> account is ordered frozen without any
