> I think it would be great, as Danny says, to have an "e-land" currency.
>
> Observably, this could be done.
>
> Would it be a success? Who knows, but it would be great to have a go.
>
> The various points people have made (including me) about why land is
> not suitable as a Money are all very we
JP, why don't you rise to the occasion? ;o)
I would have no interest in doing it, and would not be interested in
being involved in such a project.
(ISL can sell a DGC Software Pak to anyone who is interested in same, though!)
As Danny says, "Money is what people are willing to accept as such",
JP, why don't you rise to the occasion? ;o)
As Danny says, "Money is what people are willing to accept as such", and
if structured in a way that it generate revenue on it's own without being
subject to risky market movements (ie. might be a good idea not to base
e-land on a block of flats), it may
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The various points people have made (including me) about why land is not
suitable as a Money are all very well. But that's a theory, observation
would be the final test!
...
I still think e-wine (properly storing good reds) would be better.
Think about the joy of
I think it would be great, as Danny says, to have an "e-land" currency.
Observably, this could be done.
Would it be a success? Who knows, but it would be great to have a go.
The various points people have made (including me) about why land is
not suitable as a Money are all very well. But tha
> > Density is not an important property as far as backing
> > an e-currency goes.
>
> It is if you actually store value. If you just pretend to
> store value, perhaps not.
There is no need to store land.
You can can just let your land be out there on the street and no thief will
take it in the
There are many shades of grey Jim.
Please don't take what I consider responsible behaviour as an indication
that you finally figured out under which category to sort me.
I might in fact not fit into any and yet in a way into most of the
mutually exclusive categories you seem to have created to so
> sizewise i'd say 1lb of gold is about the same size as
> a *wine cork*!
> nearby wine cork is about 7/8 inch diameter and 1 3/4 inches
> long which is just over 1 inch cubed.
You gotta stop drinking, Jay... ;)
You lush!
Ragnar
__
Do You Ya
>> What's the best physical object to compare it to? ("pack of
>> cigarettes," "deck of cards" or something)
>
>sizewise i'd say 1lb of gold is about the same size as
>a *wine cork*!
good one!!! Let's say then a champagne cork, which is a bit chunkier
compare to a pint bottle of wine (or
> What's the best physical object to compare it to? ("pack of
> cigarettes," "deck of cards" or something)
sizewise i'd say 1lb of gold is about the same size as
a *wine cork*!
according to the live e-gold statistics page at
http://stats.e-gold.com
there are around 200 e-gold account holders w
On 27 May 2002, at 11:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What's the best physical object to compare it to? ("pack of
> cigarettes," "deck of cards" or something)
Smaller than that I think... I would say a cube of 3cm.
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscr
11 matches
Mail list logo
