[e-gold-list] Re: turn 'em off!

2001-06-21 Thread Julian Morrison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am just saying there exists no non-cottage-industry EREs. Hence, e-gold should say since e-gold is currently only used for HYIPs (let's call a spade a spade) and a couple of novelty sites, and we really want some non-cottage-industry egold related enterprises,

[e-gold-list] Re: turn 'em off!

2001-06-21 Thread Viking Coder
I think you have it back assward there. What e-gold should do is say hey, currently were excellently suited to cottage industries - and small web vendors are a vast market in aggregate. Lets push e-gold as the ultimate way to run a mom-and-pop shop! Yes. The only companies willing to accept

[e-gold-list] Re: turn 'em off!

2001-06-21 Thread Julian Morrison
Viking Coder wrote: [...]Everybody keeps saying how powerful the gold economy will be several years from now, and then coming up with schemes to make it pre-maturely happen today. Agreed, it's a bad idea to rush adoption speed - you need a minimum number of *working* *trusted* sites taking