> From: Steve Schear
> Sent: Tuesday, 7 October 2003 3:35 AM
> Subject: [e-gold-list] Re: When e-gold takes off in a big way
[Addressing FileMatrix, he writes:)
> Well, as the joke goes... we've already established what you 
> are, now we're 
> just haggling over the price.  Inflation is theft.  What you 
> seem to be 
> implying is that its OK to steal a little, everybody does 
> this.  
<SNIP>


This reminds me of when Moslems point out that the Islamic restriction
of men to no more than four wives was such an improvement in the
treatment of women compared to the polytheism (and unrestrained
polygamy) that was in Arabia before. But from our (and the first wife's)
perspective it is still polygamy.

In the same way, when the Reserve Bank of Australia began its
inflation-targeting policy, it was such an improvement on the more
interventionist (exchange-rate controlling) policy before it, which had
resulted in strangling the economy with 18% interest rates and high
inflation and high unemployment while trying (in vain) to maintain a
stable exchange rate (against US Dollars). The reasoning (for the
current policy) was that avoiding high inflation keeps the local economy
healthy, which in the long run improves the value of the local currency
as measured against the greenback (or at least against the
"trade-weighted index" of currencies). This has been quite successful,
but the RBA in their 'fight inflation first' (inflation targeting)
policy chose to define this as (successfully) endeavouring to keep
inflation in the two to three percent range.

The logic behind the 2-3 percent desirable inflation range was twofold. 

1. When measuring inflation on a 'basket' of goods and services, the
price of the particular goods and services may inflate slightly, while
competition enables consumers to choose different goods and services
that provide better value for money. The resulting changes are only
reflected some years later when economists realise that they must choose
a different, more representative basket of goods and services. This is
why the CPI (consumer price index) is not calculated on a basket
including horseshoes, saddles and horse feed like it may have included a
hundred years ago. Obviously the basket of goods should include
everything sold in the entire economy, and should therefore be
continually changing, but this is not practical for making economic
measurements!

2. Trying to hold inflation to a hard and exacting target of zero might
require 'wild' fluctuations in interest rates, further depressing
economic activity in the long run, whereas having a range of movement
requiring no adjustment (manipulation) allows for some natural
fluctuation, which evens out in the long run.

So, compensating for this effect it is supposed that true price
stability may be represented by an inflation rate of two or three
percent. In this case a policy of targeting zero CPI increases would
require Reserve Bank policies to induce real deflation thereby
inadvertently restricting real economic growth!

Relating this back to the 'four wives is not so much polygamy'
comparison, what if at times (due to varying rates of change in the
representative basket of goods and services) the correct adjusted CPI
inflation target *should* be sometimes less than two percent (or more
than three percent)? In years like that the Reserve Bank is then (and
bear in mind that they are only using the crude tool of official
interest rates to drive inflation), inflating away people's wealth and
savings (or in the opposite condition, through real deflation, favouring
another group of people to the detriment of others).

Naturally we should avoid taking any metaphor too far, so I might note
that the comparison does NOT work the other way, to imply that having a
little more than one wife would result in true monogamy! :^o

Best regards,
Ian Green
http://iangreen.2cw.org


PS: Nothing in the above should be taken to indicate endorsement of
government (or quasi-government) manipulation or measurement of the
economy. This is the beauty of a free market, *gold* (non-fiat) economy,
that the market takes care of these things without economists
representing government-like force making official tweaks (to interest
rates or money supply) to keep things running smoothly!


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) 
via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common 
viruses.

Reply via email to