Viking Coder wrote: > > > If they want a halfass currency with elastic attached, which they can > > jerk back out of the merchant's hands post facto, then the *merchants* > > will be quite justified in telling them to take a running jump, once > > they see an alternative is available. > > DING, DING, DING!!! We have a winner! Oo, oo, what'd I win? :-D > The consumer gets a method of spending over the internet that doesn't > leave them wide open for fraud. Their account can only accessed if they > allow it. Read one of my other posts before responding to that last > statment. Not sure which post you're referring to. The problem that sparked this whole discussion is that it's trivial to *push* money into people's accounts without their permission. --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
