Re: [E1000-devel] Kernel panic ixgbe-2.0.72.4 against 164.15.1

2010-07-14 Thread Skidmore, Donald C
Hi Jim, Sorry you're having problems building ixgbe. This failure doesn't look familiar to me and I don't currently have the kernel you were working on handy. However the first question that comes to mind: did you try building the latest ixgbe on source forge (2.0.84.9) and if so did it also

Re: [E1000-devel] Issue with X520-SR2 10 GbE NIC

2010-07-14 Thread Bob Gilligan
Skidmore, Donald C wrote: > Hey Bob, > > That's a good data point to know it fails with other switches. I would still > be interested if it failed in a back-2-back configuration. We don't yet have the resources at the site where this problem is occurring to try that. > Also we haven't been ab

[E1000-devel] Kernel panic ixgbe-2.0.72.4 against 164.15.1

2010-07-14 Thread Guo, Weiping (Jim)
Hi All, I build the ixgbe-2.0.72.4 against the kernel 2.6.18-164.15.1.el5xen (using default configuration). However, when I tried to configure the card, the kernel panic right away. If I use the driver built-in 5.4, it works OK (at least no oops). The issue is that I could not use built-in

[E1000-devel] Income Tax

2010-07-14 Thread Dynamic Bookkeepers
Your email program does not support HTML. To view an online version of this email, please click the link below. http://newsletters.bulk-mail.co.za/new/en_send_preview_iframe2.aspx?SID=14&Section=191669&SiteID=19383&EmailID=13730815&HitID=1279139614546 To&token=aeee9d2e6c04449cfffd21a3703c58a0ec

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e: receives no packets after resume (2.6.35-rc3-00262-g984bc96)

2010-07-14 Thread Tantilov, Emil S
Nico Schottelius wrote: > Hey Jeff, > > Jeff Kirsher [Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 02:47:26PM -0700]: >> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 00:28, Nico Schottelius >> wrote: >> [...] >> Adding the Networking Kernel mailing list (netdev) and Intel Linux >> LAN Driver mailing list (e1000-patches)... >> >> Would it be

[E1000-devel] Is there any infrastructure in igb driver code to map a VMDq queue to an virtual interface in a linux container?

2010-07-14 Thread 贺鹏
HI Everyone: I read the igb code. it seems the VMDq supports only works in the network cards with SR-IOV. For the network cards like intel 82575, only supports the VMDq not SR-IOV, I'm thinking since a phy interface can attach more than one MAC address, and it can split the traffic wi

[E1000-devel] Is there any infrastructure in igb driver code to map a VMDq queue to an virtual interface in a linux container?

2010-07-14 Thread 贺鹏
HI Everyone: I read the igb code. it seems the VMDq supports only works in the network cards with SR-IOV. For the network cards like intel 82575, only supports the VMDq not SR-IOV, I'm thinking since a phy interface can attach more than one MAC address, and it can split the traffic

[E1000-devel] how to dynamically change copper and fiber state on 82571 adpter?

2010-07-14 Thread wjk_welcome_u
Hello everyone, I use 82571EB adpter and my product supports copper and fiber port mutually exclusive. How to dynamically change the port state between copper and fiber? Thanks!-- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint