[E1000-devel] Handset Test positions available!

2011-09-26 Thread Dan Tobias
Hi, I am currently conducting multiple searches for mobile handset or device test engineers. We have positions ranging from test lab managers, to drive test engineers. If you have ANY experience doing high or low level handset testing on the carrier or device OEM side, with technologies suc

Re: [E1000-devel] intel 82599 multi-port performance

2011-09-26 Thread Ben Greear
On 09/26/2011 09:40 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 09/26/2011 10:04 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > >> It sounds like you are using a single card, would that be correct? If >> you are running close to line rate on both ports this could be causing >> you to saturate the PCIe x8 link. > > According to >

Re: [E1000-devel] intel 82599 multi-port performance

2011-09-26 Thread Ben Greear
On 09/26/2011 10:46 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 09/26/2011 11:24 AM, Ben Greear wrote: >> On 09/26/2011 09:40 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: > >>> To any of the Intel guys out there...any ideas? Can an 82599 on an 8x >>> bus handle max line rate with minimum size packets? >> >> Rick Jones sent me an in

[E1000-devel] 发改委关于2011年企业自主创新专项资金申报与产业发展(10月27日成都会议)

2011-09-26 Thread zkfoqku
1:56:47-- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and

Re: [E1000-devel] intel 82599 multi-port performance

2011-09-26 Thread Chris Friesen
On 09/26/2011 11:24 AM, Ben Greear wrote: > On 09/26/2011 09:40 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: >> To any of the Intel guys out there...any ideas? Can an 82599 on an 8x >> bus handle max line rate with minimum size packets? > > Rick Jones sent me an interesting link related to this. Short answer seems >

Re: [E1000-devel] intel 82599 multi-port performance

2011-09-26 Thread Chris Friesen
On 09/26/2011 10:04 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > It sounds like you are using a single card, would that be correct? If > you are running close to line rate on both ports this could be causing > you to saturate the PCIe x8 link. According to "http://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2009

Re: [E1000-devel] Needing help for igb

2011-09-26 Thread Ronciak, John
If you use a 2.6.39 or newer kernel 1588 timestamping is enabled in the driver by default when it's enabled in the kernel. Please try a newer kernel. If you can't look to see if you can backport both the kernel and possibly driver changes to your older kernel. Cheers, John > -Original M

[E1000-devel] Needing help for igb

2011-09-26 Thread Plank, Stefan
Hello, I have studied documentation for IEEE 1588 PTP and Intel 82576 with IGB driver. But I don't get HW timestamps in sending PTP packets? I am using linux kernel 2.6.37.6 igb driver 3.1.16 I downloaded a ptpd which works without hw timestamping very well. When adding hw support nothing happen

[E1000-devel] Banner Setembro2 de 2011

2011-09-26 Thread Refrimur
  Problemas para visualizar a mensagem? Acesse aqui   Clique para não receber nossos emails     -- All the data continuously generated in