On 11/03/2011 09:39 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> (moving the discussion back to the list)
>
> Hi,
>
> I am sorry, I didn't receive your patch as we discussed in private
> and ended up writing one patch myself which essentially does the
> same thing.
>
> The patch is available at:
> https://bugzilla.
>-Original Message-
>From: Maxime Larocque [mailto:maxmtl2...@yahoo.ca]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 1:03 PM
>To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: [E1000-devel] PATCH: PTP support for 82574 in e1000e 1.6.3 driver
>
>Hi,
>
>This patch adds timestamping for PTP on the 82574L.
>-Original Message-
>From: Artem S. Tashkinov [mailto:t.ar...@lycos.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 5:09 AM
>To: Allan, Bruce W; Kirsher, Jeffrey T
>Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: About the fix "e1000e: workaround for packet drop on 82579 at 100Mbps
>(commit 0ed013e28fe
Great to hear. We'll spin a build for our internal validation team. Barring
any unforeseen issues it should be coming out in the next release of the igbvf
driver to sourceforge. We'll keep you updated if anything comes up.
Thanks!
- Greg
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bulpin [ma
Hi Greg,
That looks a lot more elegant than mine :) . I've tested on my rig and it works
fine (applied to igbvf 1.1.5).
Thanks,
James
-Original Message-
From: Rose, Gregory V [mailto:gregory.v.r...@intel.com]
Sent: 03 November 2011 17:21
To: Rose, Gregory V; James Bulpin; e1000-devel@
James,
Could you please try this patch? It should be pretty much identical to yours
but reuses code a bit more.
If it works for you then we'll go ahead and submit for internal validation and
testing and then take it from there.
Thanks,
--- igbvf-old/igbvf-2.0.1/src/e1000_vf.c2011-11-
(moving the discussion back to the list)
Hi,
I am sorry, I didn't receive your patch as we discussed in private
and ended up writing one patch myself which essentially does the
same thing.
The patch is available at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746272#c13
It schedules a workqueue
