Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH v2] e1000e: Avoid wrong check on TX hang

2011-12-05 Thread Michael Wang
Hi, all I'm really sorry, I think I have made too many confusion and waste your time especially to Jeff. I think it's time to make things clear, so I send out my v2 patch, and I will keep follow if David suggest more edition. Jeff: I'm very happy you are willing to help us, but I want to do the

[E1000-devel] [PATCH v2] e1000e: Avoid wrong check on TX hang

2011-12-05 Thread Michael Wang
From: Michael Wang Descriptors may not be write-back while checking TX hang with flag FLAG2_DMA_BURST on. So when we detect hang, we just flush the descriptor and detect again for once. v2: Change 0, 1 to false and true, remove excessive parenthesis. Signed-off-by: Michael Wang --- drivers/ne

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] e1000e: Assign true and false to bool type variable instead of 1 and 0

2011-12-05 Thread Michael Wang
On 12/06/2011 01:28 AM, Jesse Brandeburg wrote: > On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 20:04:52 -0800 > Michael Wang wrote: > >> From: Michael Wang >> >> Use true and false instead of 1 and 0 when assign value to a bool type >> variable. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang >> --- >> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1

Re: [E1000-devel] WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1904 skb_gso_segment+0x146/0x298()

2011-12-05 Thread Jesse Brandeburg
cc: e1000-devel On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:30:34 -0800 Paweł Staszewski wrote: > After upgrade from 2.6.38.2 to 3.1.2 i have this im dmesg: > [ 600.266497] WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1904 skb_gso_segment+0x146/0x298() > [ 600.266500] Hardware name: X8DTU-6+ > [ 600.266503] 802.1Q VLAN Support: cap

Re: [E1000-devel] No usable DMA configuration: 82541GI

2011-12-05 Thread Taylor, Neal E
64-bit hypervisor, 32-bit Dom0 kernel with customizing patches in the areas of md, nbd and loop. Also running with these relevant patches: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/1/100, "[PATCH v2] xen: x86_32: do not enable iterrupts when returning from exception in interrupt context" http://xen.1045712.n

Re: [E1000-devel] No usable DMA configuration: 82541GI

2011-12-05 Thread Dave, Tushar N
Are you running 64 bit kernel? uname -r ? -Tushar From: Taylor, Neal E [mailto:neal.tay...@ca.com] Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 7:24 AM To: Dave, Tushar N; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Brandeburg, Jesse Cc: Quach, Minh T Subject: RE: No usable DMA configuration: 82541GI The only mods I

Re: [E1000-devel] No usable DMA configuration: 82541GI

2011-12-05 Thread Taylor, Neal E
The only mods I have there are debug statements. That section of code looks like: /* * there is a workaround being applied below that limits * 64-bit DMA addresses to 64-bit hardware. There are some * 32-bit adapters that Tx hang when given 64-bit DMA addresses

[E1000-devel] Now or never, unbeatable price with all free shipping

2011-12-05 Thread R4bay team
( http://t.spread3.net/t.aspx/subid/66759084/camid/87222/linkid/3300168/Default.aspx ) China Wholesale ( http://t.spread3.net/t.aspx/subid/66759084/camid/87222/linkid/3300168/Default.aspx ) ( http://t.spread3.net/t.aspx/subid/66759084/camid/87222/lin